Use of a Risk Stratification Tool to Guide Evaluation of Patients With Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria
- PMID: 32305550
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.03.045
Use of a Risk Stratification Tool to Guide Evaluation of Patients With Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria
Abstract
Objective: To determine if use of the hematuria risk index can reduce testing and cost, while maintaining equivalent lesion detection in patients with asymptomatic microscopic hematuria.
Materials and methods: Retrospective cohort study of 1049 patients at single institution. Hematuria risk index score was calculated based on clinical factors including age, sex, smoking history, and degree of hematuria for each patient along with evaluation studies performed and total number of tumors discovered. Cost benefit analysis was performed based on published Medicare averages.
Results: Tumor detection rate in overall, low-risk, and moderate-risk groups were 1.2%, 0%, and 2.96% at a total cost of $408,376. When low-risk group is not screened cost decreases to $166,252 with no lesions missed. The cost to discover one lesion/cancer in the overall group was $34,031.3, the cost to find one high-grade clinically significant lesion/cancer was $136,125.3 for the overall group. When the low-risk group was removed, the cost to find a high-grade clinically significant lesion/cancer decreased to $55,417.3 without missing any significant lesions. Ultrasound may be utilized instead of computed tomography with minimal loss of lesion detection in select moderate risk patients.
Conclusion: None of the low-risk hematuria risk patients were diagnosed with any lesions, as such these patients may not need an evaluation. Furthermore, by utilizing a risk-stratified approach to the assessment of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria health care costs can be significantly decreased with limited negative consequences in terms of lesion detection.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Assessing the Costs of Extraurinary Findings of Computed Tomography Urogram in the Evaluation of Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria.Urology. 2016 Sep;95:34-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jun 16. Urology. 2016. PMID: 27318261
-
Cost of upper tract imaging obtained during hematuria evaluation: Analysis of a national claims database.Urol Oncol. 2024 Aug;42(8):246.e1-246.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.03.008. Epub 2024 Apr 27. Urol Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38679529
-
Asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in women.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;31(6):471-476. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000573. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31592827 Review.
-
Diagnostic value of a urine-based tumor marker for screening lower urinary tract in low-risk patients with asymptomatic microscopic hematuria.Urol Int. 2011;87(1):35-41. doi: 10.1159/000325376. Epub 2011 Jun 3. Urol Int. 2011. PMID: 21654152
-
Cost-effectiveness of Common Diagnostic Approaches for Evaluation of Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria.JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jun 1;177(6):800-807. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0739. JAMA Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28418451 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
