Persuasive Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention in the Context of a KPC Outbreak: A Controlled Interrupted Time Series Analysis
- PMID: 32317012
- PMCID: PMC7175563
- DOI: 10.1186/s13756-020-00718-5
Persuasive Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention in the Context of a KPC Outbreak: A Controlled Interrupted Time Series Analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance is a major public health threat. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is one of the key strategies to overcome resistance, but robust evidence on the effect of specific interventions is lacking. We report an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis of a persuasive AMS intervention implemented during a KPC producing Klebsiella pneumoniae outbreak.
Methods: A controlled ITS for carbapenem consumption, total antibiotic consumption and antibiotic-free days, between January 2012 and May 2018 was performed, using segmented regression analysis. The AMS intervention was implemented in the Vascular Surgery ward starting on April 2016 in the context of a KPC outbreak. The General Surgery ward was taken as a control group. Data were aggregated by month for both wards, including 51 pre-intervention and 26 intervention points.
Results: The AMS intervention produced a level change in carbapenem consumption of - 11.14 DDDs/100 patient-days accompanied by a decreasing trend of total antibiotic consumption and stable rate of antibiotic-free days in Vascular Surgery ward. These differences were not apparent in the control group. No differences in mortality or readmission rates between pre-intervention and intervention periods were noticed in any of the groups.
Conclusion: Persuasive AMS interventions on top of previously implemented restrictive interventions can reduce carbapenem consumption without increasing total antibiotic consumption. Starting persuasive AMS interventions in an outbreak setting does not compromise the sustainability of the intervention.
Keywords: Antibiotic resistance; Antimicrobial stewardship; Interrupted time series; Prospective audit and feedback.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Half of Prescribed Antibiotics Are Not Needed: A Pharmacist-Led Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention and Clinical Outcomes in a Referral Hospital in Ethiopia.Front Public Health. 2020 Apr 9;8:109. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00109. eCollection 2020. Front Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32328474 Free PMC article.
-
De-escalation and discontinuation strategies in high-risk neutropenic patients: an interrupted time series analyses of antimicrobial consumption and impact on outcome.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Oct;37(10):1931-1940. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-3328-1. Epub 2018 Jul 26. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018. PMID: 30051357
-
Sustained multimodal antimicrobial stewardship in an Australian tertiary intensive care unit from 2008-2015: an interrupted time-series analysis.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Apr;51(4):620-628. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.01.017. Epub 2018 Jan 31. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018. PMID: 29410029
-
Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 9;2(2):CD003543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28178770 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Antimicrobial stewardship for acute-care hospitals: An Asian perspective.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;39(10):1237-1245. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.188. Epub 2018 Sep 19. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018. PMID: 30227898 Review.
References
-
- de Kraker MEA, Abbas M, Huttner B, Harbarth S, Pullenayegum E, Devereaux PJ, et al. Good epidemiological practice: a narrative review of appropriate scientific methods to evaluate the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;11:21. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.05.019. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
