Repeat Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Transcatheter Prosthesis Dysfunction
- PMID: 32327098
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.051
Repeat Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Transcatheter Prosthesis Dysfunction
Abstract
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) use is increasing in patients with longer life expectancy, yet robust data on the durability of transcatheter heart valves (THVs) are limited. Redo-TAVR may play a key strategy in treating patients in whom THVs fail.
Objectives: The authors sought to examine outcomes following redo-TAVR.
Methods: The Redo-TAVR registry collected data on consecutive patients who underwent redo-TAVR at 37 centers. Patients were classified as probable TAVR failure or probable THV failure if they presented within or beyond 1 year of their index TAVR, respectively.
Results: Among 63,876 TAVR procedures, 212 consecutive redo-TAVR procedures were identified (0.33%): 74 within and 138 beyond 1 year of the initial procedure. For these 2 groups, TAVR-to-redo-TAVR time was 68 (38 to 154) days and 5 (3 to 6) years. The indication for redo-TAVR was THV stenosis in 12 (16.2%) and 51 (37.0%) (p = 0.002) and regurgitation or combined stenosis-regurgitation in 62 (83.8%) and 86 (62.3%) (p = 0.028), respectively. Device success using VARC-2 criteria was achieved in 180 patients (85.1%); most failures were attributable to high residual gradients (14.1%) or regurgitation (8.9%). At 30-day and 1-year follow-up, residual gradients were 12.6 ± 7.5 mm Hg and 12.9 ± 9.0 mm Hg; valve area 1.63 ± 0.61 cm2 and 1.51 ± 0.57 cm2; and regurgitation ≤mild in 91% and 91%, respectively. Peri-procedural complication rates were low (3 stroke [1.4%], 7 valve malposition [3.3%], 2 coronary obstruction [0.9%], 20 new permanent pacemaker [9.6%], no mortality), and symptomatic improvement was substantial. Survival at 30 days was 94.6% and 98.5% (p = 0.101) and 83.6% and 88.3% (p = 0.335) at 1 year for patients presenting with early and late valve dysfunction, respectively.
Conclusions: Redo-TAVR is a relatively safe and effective option for selected patients with valve dysfunction after TAVR. These results are important for applicability of TAVR in patients with long life expectancy in whom THV durability may be a concern.
Keywords: durability; transcatheter aortic valve replacement; transcatheter heart valve; valve-in-valve.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Comment in
-
TAVR in TAVR: The Future Is Now.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Apr 28;75(16):1894-1896. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.017. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 32327099 No abstract available.
-
TAVR-in-TAVR?: Don't Bank on It!J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Aug 25;76(8):1003. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.083. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 32819458 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Coronary Artery Obstruction Risk With Redo TAVR: A Word of Caution.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Aug 25;76(8):1004. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.082. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 32819459 No abstract available.
-
Reply: Redo-TAVR May Not Always Be an Option.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Aug 25;76(8):1004-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.047. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 32819460 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes of Redo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for the Treatment of Postprocedural and Late Occurrence of Paravalvular Regurgitation and Transcatheter Valve Failure.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep;9(9):e003930. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.003930. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016. PMID: 27578840
-
Outcomes of repeat transcatheter aortic valve replacement with balloon-expandable valves: a registry study.Lancet. 2023 Oct 28;402(10412):1529-1540. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01636-7. Epub 2023 Aug 31. Lancet. 2023. PMID: 37660719
-
Transcatheter Replacement of Transcatheter Versus Surgically Implanted Aortic Valve Bioprostheses.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jan 5;77(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.10.053. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 33413929
-
Redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement in degenerated transcatheter bioprosthesis (TAV-in-TAV).Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2023 Jul-Dec;21(10):703-712. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2023.2266368. Epub 2023 Oct 26. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2023. PMID: 37815845 Review.
-
What is the best approach in a patient with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve: transcatheter aortic valve replacement or redo aortic valve replacement?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;20(6):837-43. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv037. Epub 2015 Mar 8. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015. PMID: 25754372 Review.
Cited by
-
Management of Surgical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) Valve Explantation for Early Degeneration: A Case Report.Cureus. 2024 Oct 22;16(10):e72143. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72143. eCollection 2024 Oct. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39575005 Free PMC article.
-
Redo-TAVI with the SAPIEN 3 valve in degenerated calcified CoreValve/Evolut explants.EuroIntervention. 2024 Nov 18;20(22):1390-1404. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00619. EuroIntervention. 2024. PMID: 39552484
-
Feasibility of redo-TAVI in the self-expanding ACURATE neo2 valve: a computed tomography study.EuroIntervention. 2024 Nov 18;20(22):1405-1415. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00367. EuroIntervention. 2024. PMID: 39552483
-
Who Lives Longer, the Valve or the Patient? The Dilemma of TAVI Durability and How to Optimize Patient Outcomes.J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 14;13(20):6123. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206123. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39458073 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement is Ready for Most Low-risk Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Card Fail Rev. 2024 Sep 13;10:e11. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2023.23. eCollection 2024. Card Fail Rev. 2024. PMID: 39386082 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
