Objectives: Current events with the recent COVID-19 outbreak are necessitating steep learning curves for the NHS workforce. Ultrasound, although not used in the diagnosis of COVID-19 may be utilised by practitioners at the point of care (POC) or on the intensive care units (ITUs) where rapid assessment of the lung condition may be required. The aim of this article was to review current literature surrounding the use of lung ultrasound in relation to COVID-19 and provide Sonographers with a quick and digestible reference guide for lung pathologies.
Key findings: Ultrasound is being used in Italy and China to help review lung condition during the COVID-19 outbreak however not strictly as a diagnostic tool as Computed Tomography (CT) of the chest and chest radiographs are currently gold standard. Ultrasound is highly sensitive in the detection of multiple lung pathologies which can be demonstrated in conjunction with COVID-19 however to date there are no specific, nor pathognomonic findings which relate to COVID-19 on ultrasound.
Conclusion: Lung ultrasound is highly sensitive and can quickly and accurately review lung condition creating potential to assess for changes or resolution over time, especially in the ITU and POC setting. However it should not be used as a diagnostic tool for COVID-19 due to low specificity in relation to the virus.
Implications for practice: The adoption of lung ultrasound to monitor lung condition during the COVID-19 outbreak may reduce the need for serial exposure to ionising radiation on the wards and in turn reduce the number of radiographers required to attend infected wards and bays, protecting both patients and the workforce.
Keywords: COVID-19; ITU; Intensive care; Lung ultrasound; POCUS; Point of care ultrasound.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statement None.
Clinical role of lung ultrasound for the diagnosis and monitoring of COVID-19 pneumonia in pregnant women.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr 26. doi: 10.1002/uog.22055. Online ahead of print. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32337795
[COVID-19 - More Lung Pocus and Sparing Use of Stethoscope, Chest X-Ray and Lung CT].Praxis (Bern 1994). 2020 May 1:1-9. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a003512. Online ahead of print. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2020. PMID: 32356672 German.
Lung ultrasound monitoring in patients with COVID-19 on home isolation.Am J Emerg Med. 2020 May 28:S0735-6757(20)30440-X. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.05.079. Online ahead of print. Am J Emerg Med. 2020. PMID: 32482483
Point-of-care lung ultrasound in patients with COVID-19 - a narrative review.Anaesthesia. 2020 Apr 10:10.1111/anae.15082. doi: 10.1111/anae.15082. Online ahead of print. Anaesthesia. 2020. PMID: 32275766 Free PMC article. Review.
Diagnostic Ultrasound Safety Review for Point-of-Care Ultrasound Practitioners.J Ultrasound Med. 2020 Jun;39(6):1069-1084. doi: 10.1002/jum.15202. Epub 2019 Dec 23. J Ultrasound Med. 2020. PMID: 31868252 Review.
Cited by 1 article
A proposed lung ultrasound and phenotypic algorithm for the care of COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure.Can J Anaesth. 2020 May 21:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01704-6. Online ahead of print. Can J Anaesth. 2020. PMID: 32440906 Free PMC article.
- Poggiali E., Dacrema A., Bastoni D., Tinelli V., Demichele E., Ramos P.M. Can lung US help critical care clinicians in the early diagnosis of Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia? Radiology. 2020 https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/pdf/10.1148/radiol.2020200847 Available at: - DOI
- Kong W., Agarwal P. Chest imaging appearances of COVID-19 infection. Radiol Cardiothorac Imag. 2020;2(1):1–22. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2020200028. - DOI
- Kanne J.P., Little B.P., Chung J.H., Elicker B.M., Ketai L.H. Essentials for Radiologists on COVID-19: an update – Radiology scientific expert panel. Radiology. 2020;1(1):1–4. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200527. - DOI
- Wimalasena Y., Kocierz L., Strong D., Watterson J., Burns B. Lung ultrasound: a useful tool in the assessment of the dyspnoeic patient in the emergency department. Fact or fiction? Br Med J. 2016;35(4):1–9. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-205937. - DOI