Antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant treatment does not increase hemorrhagic adverse events during EUS-guided biliary drainage

Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Sep;92(3):659-666. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.038. Epub 2020 Apr 22.

Abstract

Background and aims: No data appear to have been reported regarding bleeding risk among patients receiving antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant treatment (AP/AC) during EUS-guided biliary drainage (BD) procedures. The aim of this study was to assess whether hemorrhagic adverse events associated with EUS-BD are increased in patients on AP/AC.

Methods: Patients receiving AP/AC who underwent EUS-BD were retrospectively enrolled between May 2015 and August 2019. Patients who did not receive AP/AC and underwent EUS-BD in the same period were also enrolled as a control group.

Results: One hundred ninety-five patients who underwent EUS-BD were enrolled in this study. Among these, 154 patients were allocated to the control group and 41 patients to the AP/AC group. Overall frequency of adverse events did not differ significantly between the control group (16.2%, 25/154) and AC/AP group (17.1%, 6/41; P = .80). The overall bleeding event rate was 3.6% (7/195), with no significant difference between the 2 groups. No thromboembolic events were observed with or without interruption of AP/AC. According to logistic regression analysis, the use of AP/AC was not a risk factor significantly associated with bleeding events (odds ratio, 2.96; 95% confidence interval, .56-14.0; P = .18). On the other hand, a long procedure time (>20 minutes) was an independent risk factor associated with bleeding events.

Conclusions: Bleeding events appear to be infrequent among patients who undergo EUS-BD while continuing AP/AC.

MeSH terms

  • Anticoagulants / adverse effects
  • Drainage
  • Endosonography* / adverse effects
  • Hemorrhage
  • Humans
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Anticoagulants
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors