Introduction: Asthma in obese subjects is poorly understood. According to GINA guidelines, pulmonologists increase ICS in case of poor asthma control but lung volume restriction may also worsen respiratory symptoms in obese asthmatics leading to overtreatment in this subpopulation.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on 1217 asthmatics recruited from University Hospital of Liege. 92 patients with a BMI ≥30 came at least two times at the asthma clinic (mean interval: 335 days). In this obese population, we identified predictors of good (decrease in ACQ ≥0.5) versus poor response (rise in ACQ ≥0.5) to ICS step-up therapy.
Results: Obese asthmatics had a poorer asthma control and quality of life as compared to non-obese and exhibited reduced FVC, higher levels of blood leucocytes and markers of systemic inflammation. The proportion of asthma inflammatory phenotypes was similar to that observed in a general population of asthmatics. Among uncontrolled obese asthmatics receiving ICS step-up therapy, 53% improved their asthma control while 31% had a worsening of their asthma. Uncontrolled obese asthmatics showing a good response to increase in ICS had higher ACQ, lower CRP levels, higher sputum eosinophil counts and higher FeNO levels at visit 1. Uncontrolled obese asthmatics that worsened after increasing the dose of ICS had lower FVC, lower sputum eosinophil counts and higher sputum neutrophil counts.
Conclusion: We observed poorer asthma control in obese asthmatics despite similar bronchial inflammation. Managing obese asthmatics according to ACQ alone seems to underestimate asthma control and the contribution of restriction to dyspnea. Increasing the dose of ICS in the absence of sputum eosinophilic inflammation or in the presence of restriction or bronchial neutrophilia led to poorer asthma control. In those patients, management of obesity should be the first choice.
Keywords: Asthma; Inflammation; Obesity; Phenotypes; Predictor; Treatment response.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.