The phenotype-driven computational analysis yields clinical diagnosis for patients with atypical manifestations of known intellectual disability syndromes

Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020 Sep;8(9):e1263. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1263. Epub 2020 Apr 26.

Abstract

Background: Due to extensive clinical and genetic heterogeneity of intellectual disability (ID) syndromes, the process of diagnosis is very challenging even for expert clinicians. Despite recent advancements in molecular diagnostics methodologies, a significant fraction of ID patients remains without a clinical diagnosis.

Methods, results, and conclusions: Here, in a prospective study on a cohort of 21 families (trios) with a child presenting with ID of unknown etiology, we executed phenotype-driven bioinformatic analysis method, PhenIX, utilizing targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) data and Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO)-encoded phenotype data. This approach resulted in clinical diagnosis for eight individuals presenting with atypical manifestations of Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome 2 (MIM 613684), Spastic Paraplegia 50 (MIM 612936), Wiedemann-Steiner syndrome (MIM 605130), Cornelia de Lange syndrome 2 (MIM 300590), Cerebral creatine deficiency syndrome 1 (MIM 300352), Glass Syndrome (MIM 612313), Mental retardation, autosomal dominant 31 (MIM 616158), and Bosch-Boonstra-Schaaf optic atrophy syndrome (MIM 615722).

Keywords: AP4M1; EP300; KMT2A; NR2F1; PURA; SATB2; SLC6A8; SMC1A; HPO; PhenIX; Phenomizer; dysmorphology; intellectual disability patients.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Databases, Genetic
  • Developmental Disabilities / diagnosis
  • Developmental Disabilities / genetics*
  • Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Female
  • Genetic Testing / methods*
  • Humans
  • Intellectual Disability / diagnosis
  • Intellectual Disability / genetics*
  • Male
  • Mutation
  • Pedigree
  • Phenotype*
  • Sequence Analysis, DNA / methods