Does N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Improve the Risk Stratification of Emergency Department Patients With Syncope?
- PMID: 32340039
- DOI: 10.7326/M19-3515
Does N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Improve the Risk Stratification of Emergency Department Patients With Syncope?
Abstract
Background: Studies have reported that natriuretic peptides provide prognostic information for emergency department (ED) syncope.
Objective: To evaluate whether adding N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) to the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) improves prediction of 30-day serious adverse events (SAEs).
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: 6 EDs in 2 Canadian provinces.
Participants: 1452 adult ED patients with syncope.
Intervention: Serum NT-proBNP was measured locally at 1 site and batch processed at a central laboratory from other sites. The concentrations were not available to treating physicians or for adjudication of outcomes.
Measurements: An adjudicated composite outcome of 30-day SAEs, including death and cardiac (arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic) and noncardiac events.
Results: Of 1452 patients enrolled, 152 (10.5% [95% CI, 9.0% to 12.1%]) had 30-day SAEs, 57 (3.9%) of which were identified after the index ED disposition. Serum NT-proBNP concentrations were significantly higher among patients with SAEs than those without them (median, 626.5 ng/L vs. 81 ng/L; P < 0.001). Adding NT-proBNP values to the CSRS did not significantly improve prognostication (c-statistic, 0.89 and 0.90; P = 0.12 for difference), regardless of SAE subgroup or whether the SAE was identified after the index ED visit. The net reclassification index shows that NT-proBNP would have correctly reclassified 3% of patients with SAEs at the expense of incorrectly reclassifying 2% of patients without SAEs.
Limitations: Our study was powered to detect a 3% difference in the area under the curve. The heterogeneity of outcomes and robust baseline discrimination by the CSRS will make improvements challenging.
Conclusion: Although serum NT-proBNP concentrations were generally much higher among ED patients with syncope who had a 30-day SAE, this blood test added little new information to the CSRS. Routine use of NT-proBNP for ED syncope prognostication is not recommended.
Primary funding source: Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and The Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical Organization.
Keywords: Arrhythmia; Attention; Cardiovascular therapy; Electrocardiography; Hematologic tests; Hemorrhage; Natriuretic peptide; Research laboratories; Syncope; Troponin.
Similar articles
-
Do High-sensitivity Troponin and Natriuretic Peptide Predict Death or Serious Cardiac Outcomes After Syncope?Acad Emerg Med. 2019 May;26(5):528-538. doi: 10.1111/acem.13709. Epub 2019 Mar 4. Acad Emerg Med. 2019. PMID: 30721554 Free PMC article.
-
Usefulness of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic Peptide increase as a marker for cardiac arrhythmia in patients with syncope.Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jan 1;113(1):98-102. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.08.044. Epub 2013 Oct 3. Am J Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 24169011
-
Preoperative N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and Cardiovascular Events After Noncardiac Surgery: A Cohort Study.Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jan 21;172(2):96-104. doi: 10.7326/M19-2501. Epub 2019 Dec 24. Ann Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 31869834
-
The prognostic value of pre-operative and post-operative B-type natriuretic peptides in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal fragment of pro-B-type natriuretic peptide: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jan 21;63(2):170-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1630. Epub 2013 Sep 26. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 24076282 Review.
-
The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD013139. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013139.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34931303 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Risk stratification tools for patients with syncope in emergency medical services and emergency departments: a scoping review.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Sep 18;31(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01102-z. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023. PMID: 37723535 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Trends in Utilization and Yield of Inpatient Transthoracic Echocardiography for Syncope: Impact of Cardiac Biomarkers.J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2022 Mar;35(3):322-323. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2021.10.011. Epub 2021 Nov 3. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2022. PMID: 34742905 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Etiology, risk factors, and prognosis of patients with syncope: A single-center analysis.Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2021 Nov;26(6):e12891. doi: 10.1111/anec.12891. Epub 2021 Sep 28. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2021. PMID: 34582604 Free PMC article.
-
A Rational Evaluation of the Syncope Patient: Optimizing the Emergency Department Visit.Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 May 21;57(6):514. doi: 10.3390/medicina57060514. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021. PMID: 34064050 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous