Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;30(9):4918-4929.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06846-1. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

Diagnostic accuracy of CT pulmonary angiography in suspected pulmonary hypertension

Affiliations

Diagnostic accuracy of CT pulmonary angiography in suspected pulmonary hypertension

Andrew J Swift et al. Eur Radiol. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: Computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiography is widely used in patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension (PH). However, the diagnostic and prognostic significance remains unclear. The aim of this study was to (a) build a diagnostic CT model and (b) test its prognostic significance.

Methods: Consecutive patients with suspected PH undergoing routine CT pulmonary angiography and right heart catheterisation (RHC) were identified. Axial and reconstructed images were used to derive CT metrics. Multivariate regression analysis was performed in the derivation cohort to identify a diagnostic CT model to predict mPAP ≥ 25 mmHg (the existing ESC guideline definition of PH) and > 20 mmHg (the new threshold proposed at the 6th World Symposium on PH). In the validation cohort, sensitivity, specificity and compromise CT thresholds were identified with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The prognostic value of the CT model was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results: Between 2012 and 2016, 491 patients were identified. In the derivation cohort (n = 247), a CT model was identified including pulmonary artery diameter, right ventricular outflow tract thickness, septal angle and left ventricular area. In the validation cohort (n = 244), the model was diagnostic, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.94/0.91 for mPAP ≥ 25/> 20 mmHg respectively. In the validation cohort, 93 patients died; mean follow-up was 42 months. The diagnostic thresholds for the CT model were prognostic, log rank, all p < 0.01.

Discussion: In suspected PH, a diagnostic CT model had diagnostic and prognostic utility.

Key points: • Diagnostic CT models have high diagnostic accuracy in a tertiary referral population of with suspected PH. • Diagnostic CT models stratify patients by mortality in suspected PH.

Keywords: Diagnostic imaging; Heart ventricles; Hypertension, pulmonary; Pulmonary artery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Multi-figure CT images illustrating the CT measurements in a patient with PH with severe elevation of pulmonary artery pressure. Illustrations show the measurement of pulmonary artery and aortic diameter (a), right ventricular outflow tract thickness (b), interventricular septal angle (c) (reconstructed short-axis images) and left ventricular area (d). Images e and f illustrate the measurements required to calculate the RV/LV diameter ratio maximal RV diameter (e) and maximal LV diameter (f)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Correlations of mean pulmonary arterial pressure with main pulmonary artery diameter (a), right ventricular outflow tract thickness (RVOT) (b), interventricular septal angle (c), left ventricular (LV) area (d) and RV/LV diameter ratio (e). f Correlation between septal angle and RV/LV diameter ratio
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Receiver operating characteristic analysis in a derivation cohort and validation cohort for diagnostic model A for prediction of mPAP ≥ 25 mmHg
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Prognostic significance of CT model A showing CT thresholds ((a) sensitive threshold and (b) compromise threshold) and mPAP thresholds ((c) mPAP ≥ 25 mmHg and (d) mPAP > 20 mmHg)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Galie N, Humbert M, Vachiery JL, et al. 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: the Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Eur Heart J. 2016;37:67–119. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv317. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kovacs G, Berghold A, Scheidl S, Olschewski H. Pulmonary arterial pressure during rest and exercise in healthy subjects: a systematic review. Eur Respir J. 2009;34:888–894. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00145608. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kiely DG, Elliot CA, Sabroe I, Condliffe R. Pulmonary hypertension: diagnosis and management. BMJ. 2013;346:f2028. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kiely DG, Levin D, Hassoun P et al (2019) EXPRESS: statement on imaging and pulmonary hypertension from the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute (PVRI). Pulm Circ. 10.1177/2045894019841990:2045894019841990 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taleb M, Khuder S, Tinkel J, Khouri SJ. The diagnostic accuracy of Doppler echocardiography in assessment of pulmonary artery systolic pressure: a meta-analysis. Echocardiography. 2013;30:258–265. doi: 10.1111/echo.12061. - DOI - PubMed