Objectives: The aim of this anatomical study is to make quantitative comparison among three endoscopic approaches, encompassing contralateral endonasal transseptal transmaxillary transpterygoid approach (contralateral EEA), endoscopic sublabial transmaxillary transalisphenoid (Caldwell-Luc) approach and endoscopic transorbital transmaxillary approach through inferior orbital fissure (ETOA), to the anterolateral skull base for assisting preoperative planning.
Design & participants: Anatomical dissections were performed in four adult cadaveric heads bilaterally using three endoscopic transmaxillary approaches described above.
Setting: Skull Base Laboratory at the National Defense Medical Center.
Main outcome measures: The area of exposure, angles of attack and depth of surgical corridor of each approach were measured and obtained for statistical comparison.
Results: The ETOA had significantly larger exposure over middle cranial fossa (731.40 ± 80.08 mm2 ) than contralateral EEA (266.60 ± 46.74 mm2 ) and Caldwell-Luc approach (468.40 ± 59.67 mm2 ). In comparison with contralateral EEA and Caldwell-Luc approach, the ETOA offered significantly greater angles of attack and shorter depth of surgical corridor (P < .05 for all comparisons).
Conclusions: The ETOA is the superior choice for target lesion occupying multiple compartments with its epicentre located in the middle cranial fossa or superior portion of infratemporal fossa.
Keywords: anterolateral skull base; endoscopic transmaxillary; transmaxillary approach.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.