Cost-effectiveness Applications of Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Spine Surgery

Clin Spine Surg. 2020 May;33(4):140-145. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000982.

Abstract

Because of the rising health care costs in the United States, there has been a focus on value-based care and improving the cost-effectiveness of surgical procedures. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can not only give physicians and health care providers immediate feedback on the well-being of the patients but also be used to assess health and determine outcomes for surgical research purposes. Recently, PROMs have become a prominent tool to assess the cost-effectiveness of spine surgery by calculating the improvement in quality-adjusted life years (QALY). The cost of a procedure per QALY gained is an essential metric to determine cost-effectiveness in universal health care systems. Common patient-reported outcome questionnaires to calculate QALY include the EuroQol-5 dimensions, the SF-36, and the SF-12. On the basis of the health-related quality of life outcomes, the cost-effectiveness of various spine surgeries can be determined, such as cervical fusions, lumbar fusions, microdiscectomies. As the United States attempts to reduce costs and emphasize value-based care, PROMs may serve a critical role in spine surgery moving forward. In addition, PROM-driven QALYs may be used to analyze novel spine surgical techniques for value-based improvements.

MeSH terms

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis*
  • Diskectomy / economics*
  • Health Care Costs
  • Humans
  • Life Expectancy
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / surgery*
  • Orthopedics / economics*
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care / economics
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures*
  • Quality of Life
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures
  • Spinal Diseases / economics
  • Spinal Diseases / surgery*
  • Spinal Fusion / economics*
  • Spinal Stenosis / surgery*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United Kingdom