Recurrence After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Lobectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Abstract

Background: Although lobectomy remains the standard of care for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer, several studies suggest equipoise between lobectomy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). However randomized evidence is lacking. We compared outcomes of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with lobectomy or SBRT.

Methods: We included clinical T1-2N0 non-small cell lung cancer treated with lobectomy or SBRT to a biologically effective dose of ≥100 Gy₁₀. We used Cox proportional hazards and nearest-neighbor propensity score (2:1) matching to adjust for confounders. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess survival and recurrence.

Results: We identified 554 patients treated with lobectomy (n = 389) or SBRT (n = 165) at our institution between 2008 and 2018. After propensity score matching, there were 132 SBRT patients and 85 lobectomy patients. SBRT was associated with increased local recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 6.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.92-24.10; P = .003) and regional nodal recurrence (HR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.17-5.68; P = .018), and with worse overall survival (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.21-3.32; P = .007) and progression-free survival (HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.50-3.67; P < .001). There was no difference in distant recurrence (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.57-2.52; P = .64).

Conclusions: We found superior outcomes in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer treated with lobectomy compared with SBRT, including locoregional control. These findings should be interpreted with caution because of selection bias but underscore the importance of robust randomized prospective data to clarify the relative efficacy of these modalities.