Implementation of maternity protection legislation: Gynecologists' perceptions and practices in French-speaking Switzerland

PLoS One. 2020 Apr 30;15(4):e0231858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231858. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Background: In several countries, maternity protection legislations (MPL) confer an essential role to gynecologist-obstetricians (OBGYNs) for the protection of pregnant workers and their future children from occupational exposures. This study explores OBGYNs' practices and difficulties in implementing MPL in the French-speaking part of Switzerland.

Methods: An online survey was sent to 333 OBGYNs. Data analysis included: 1) descriptive and correlational statistics and 2) hierarchical cluster analysis to identify patterns of practices.

Results: OBGYNs evoked several problems in MPL implementation: absence of risk analysis in the companies, difficult collaboration with employers, lack of competencies in the field of occupational health. Preventive leave was underused, with sick leave being prescribed instead. Training had a positive effect on OBGYNs' knowledge and implementation of MPL. Hierarchical cluster analysis highlighted three main types of practices: 1) practice in line with legislation; 2) practice on a case-by-case basis; 3) limited practice. OBGYNs with good knowledge of MPL more consistently applied its provisions.

Conclusion: The implementation of MPL appears challenging for OBGYNs. Collaboration with occupational physicians and training might help OBGYNs to better take on their role in maternity protection. MPL in itself could be improved.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Gynecology / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Language*
  • Maternal Health / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Middle Aged
  • Occupational Exposure / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Occupational Exposure / prevention & control*
  • Perception
  • Pregnancy
  • Switzerland

Grants and funding

This study was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number 162713), by the Vaud Public Health Service, and by a research fund of the University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland (HES-SO). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.