While functional neuroimaging studies typically focus on a particular paradigm to investigate network connectivity, the human brain appears to possess an intrinsic "trait" architecture that is independent of any given paradigm. We have previously proposed the use of "cross-paradigm connectivity (CPC)" to quantify shared connectivity patterns across multiple paradigms and have demonstrated the utility of such measures in clinical studies. Here, using generalizability theory and connectome fingerprinting, we examined the reliability, stability, and individual identifiability of CPC in a group of highly-sampled healthy traveling subjects who received fMRI scans with a battery of five paradigms across multiple sites and days. Compared with single-paradigm connectivity matrices, the CPC matrices showed higher reliability in connectivity diversity, lower reliability in connectivity strength, higher stability, and higher individual identification accuracy. All of these assessments increased as a function of number of paradigms included in the CPC analysis. In comparisons involving different paradigm combinations and different brain atlases, we observed significantly higher reliability, stability, and identifiability for CPC matrices constructed from task-only data (versus those from both task and rest data), and higher identifiability but lower stability for CPC matrices constructed from the Power atlas (versus those from the AAL atlas). Moreover, we showed that multi-paradigm CPC matrices likely reflect the brain's "trait" structure that cannot be fully achieved from single-paradigm data, even with multiple runs. The present results provide evidence for the feasibility and utility of CPC in the study of functional "trait" networks and offer some methodological implications for future CPC studies.
Keywords: Cross-paradigm connectivity; Functional connectome; Individual identifiability; Reliability; Stability.
Toward Leveraging Human Connectomic Data in Large Consortia: Generalizability of fMRI-Based Brain Graphs Across Sites, Sessions, and Paradigms.Cereb Cortex. 2019 Mar 1;29(3):1263-1279. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy032. Cereb Cortex. 2019. PMID: 29522112 Free PMC article.
Test-retest reliability of functional connectivity networks during naturalistic fMRI paradigms.Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Apr;38(4):2226-2241. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23517. Epub 2017 Jan 17. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017. PMID: 28094464
A human brain atlas derived via n-cut parcellation of resting-state and task-based fMRI data.Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Feb;34(2):209-18. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2015.10.036. Epub 2015 Oct 31. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016. PMID: 26523655 Free PMC article.
The Healthy Brain Network Serial Scanning Initiative: a resource for evaluating inter-individual differences and their reliabilities across scan conditions and sessions.Gigascience. 2017 Feb 1;6(2):1-14. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giw011. Gigascience. 2017. PMID: 28369458 Free PMC article.
The structural and functional connectivity of the posterior cingulate cortex: comparison between deterministic and probabilistic tractography for the investigation of structure-function relationships.Neuroimage. 2014 Nov 15;102 Pt 1:118-27. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.022. Epub 2013 Dec 21. Neuroimage. 2014. PMID: 24365673 Review.
- 27068/Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
- U01 MH081902/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- P50 MH066286/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- U01 MH081857/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- U01 MH82022/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States