Transoral robotic surgery hypopharyngectomy (TORSH): feasibility and outcomes
- PMID: 32367147
- DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-05984-y
Transoral robotic surgery hypopharyngectomy (TORSH): feasibility and outcomes
Abstract
Purpose: With the development of minimal invasive procedure, trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS) is expanding in the field of ENT. Most reviews focus on oropharyngeal and laryngeal (supra-glottic) localization. We report here the feasibility and outcomes of TORS hypopharyngectomy (TORSH) for selected patients with hypopharyngeal tumor.
Methods: Between September 2009 and July 2017, 22 patients, retrospectively included, underwent TORSH with curative intent.
Results: From 22 successful hypopharyngectomy, no conversion to open procedure was needed. Three patients (13%) presented a post-operative bleeding and were managed by surgical revision. No fistula was encountered. The 3-year overall survival and disease-specific survival rates were 54 and 92%, respectively. Patients started oral feeding after an average of 7 days. Naso-gastric feeding tubes were removed after a median period of 16 days. Two patients (9%) needed a transient gastrostomy (< 1 year). Three patients (13%) received a transient tracheostomy (< 2 months). Median hospitalization stay was 13 days.
Conclusions: TORSH is a safe technique. Patients' outcomes are favorable and the post-operative morbidity is reduced compared to open neck approach. Hospitalization length and safe swallowing time are reduced.
Keywords: Head and neck tumors; Hypopharynx; Oncology; Robotic surgery; Transoral.
Similar articles
-
Transoral robotic medial hypopharyngectomy: Surgical technique.Head Neck. 2016 Apr;38 Suppl 1:E2127-9. doi: 10.1002/hed.24360. Epub 2015 Dec 29. Head Neck. 2016. PMID: 26714289
-
Oncological and functional outcomes of trans-oral robotic surgery for pyriform sinus carcinoma: A French GETTEC group study.Oral Oncol. 2018 Nov;86:165-170. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.09.014. Epub 2018 Sep 25. Oral Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30409296
-
Transoral robot-assisted carbon dioxide laser surgery for hypopharyngeal cancer.Head Neck. 2015 May;37(5):743-5. doi: 10.1002/hed.23860. Epub 2015 Mar 29. Head Neck. 2015. PMID: 25224300
-
Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers.J Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;112(7):702-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.24002. Epub 2015 Aug 12. J Surg Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26266762 Review.
-
Early experience in transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for non-oropharyngeal head and neck malignancies: a review of functional and oncologic outcomes.B-ENT. 2015;Suppl 24:21-31. B-ENT. 2015. PMID: 26891528 Review.
Cited by
-
The Role of Open Conservation Surgery in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Hypopharyngeal Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Oct 21;59(10):1873. doi: 10.3390/medicina59101873. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023. PMID: 37893591 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transoral Robotic Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer: Advances and Residual Knowledge Gaps.J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 16;12(6):2303. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062303. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36983308 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Oncological and Functional Outcomes of Transoral Robotic Surgery and Endoscopic Laryngopharyngeal Surgery for Hypopharyngeal Cancer: A Systematic Review.Front Surg. 2022 Apr 7;8:810581. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.810581. eCollection 2021. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 35464886 Free PMC article.
-
Airway management during transoral robotic surgery for head and neck cancers: a French GETTEC group survey.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jul;279(7):3619-3627. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07188-4. Epub 2022 Jan 23. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022. PMID: 35066651
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
