Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 27;7(2):157-164.
doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1738. eCollection 2020 Spring.

What Outcomes Matter to Patients After Joint or Spine Surgery?

Affiliations

What Outcomes Matter to Patients After Joint or Spine Surgery?

Robin R Whitebird et al. J Patient Cent Res Rev. .

Abstract

Purpose: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used in clinical care, but there have been few studies of what patients identify as the most important outcomes.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 65 patients undergoing hip or knee replacement, spinal discectomy/laminotomy, or a spinal fusion. Interviews focused on outcomes patients identified as important, perceived usefulness of standardized PROMs measures, and contextual situations important to their care. Data were analyzed using a directed content analysis approach.

Results: Patients identified desired outcomes that were unique and important to them. Their preferred outcomes focused in the areas of freedom from pain, getting back to their normal life, and returning to an active lifestyle. Patients cared more about their individual preferred outcomes, which had more meaning for them, than a standardized PROM score. Patients also identified particular contextual situations that their care team was assumed to know about but that may not have been known.

Conclusions: Patients identify specific preferred outcomes from these surgical procedures that are important and meaningful to them and that frame whether they see their surgery as a success. They also identified personal factors that they assume their surgeons know about, which affect their care and recovery. These findings underscore the importance of engaging patients in discussions about their preferences and contextual factors both prior to and after surgery.

Keywords: PROMs; joint replacement; orthopedics; patient-reported outcomes; spinal fusion; surgery outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest None.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wiering B, de Boer D, Delnoij D. Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures: a scoping review. Health Expect. 2017;20:11–23. doi: 10.1111/hex.12442. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weldring T, Smith SM. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) Health Serv Insights. 2013;6:61–8. doi: 10.4137/HSI.S11093. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Black N. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ. 2013;346:f167. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f167. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McKenna SP. Measuring patient-reported outcomes: moving beyond misplaced common sense to hard science. BMC Med. 2011;9:86. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-86. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Solberg LI, Asche SE, Butler J, et al. Patient-centered outcomes measurement: Does it require information from patients? J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2017;4:221–9. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1456. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources