Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Jun;75(6):775-784.
doi: 10.1111/anae.15036.

10 kHz spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of non-surgical refractory back pain: subanalysis of pooled data from two prospective studies

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

10 kHz spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of non-surgical refractory back pain: subanalysis of pooled data from two prospective studies

A Al-Kaisy et al. Anaesthesia. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz is a promising therapy for non-surgical refractory back pain; however, published data are currently limited. We present a subanalysis of prospectively collected clinical outcome data for non-surgical refractory back pain patients treated with 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation, from the independent cohorts of two previous studies (SENZA-RCT and SENZA-EU). Clinical outcomes were evaluated at pre-implantation (baseline), 3 months, 6 months and 12 months following 10 kHz spinal cord stimulator implantation. These included: pain relief; responder rate (≥ 50% pain relief from baseline); remission rate (VAS ≤ 3.0 cm); disability (Oswestry Disability Index(ODI)); and opioid use. At 3 months, average back pain decreased by 70% in the combined cohort (60% in the SENZA-RCT and 78% in the SENZA-EU cohorts). This was sustained at 12 months, with a 73% back pain responder rate and 68% remission rate in the combined cohort. Leg pain relief results were generally comparable to those for back pain relief. At 12 months, the combined cohort had an average decrease in ODI scores of 15.7% points from baseline and opioid use more than halved. In conclusion, 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation reduced pain, disability and opioid consumption in non-surgical refractory back pain subjects. Application of this therapy may improve the care of non-surgical refractory back pain patients and reduce their opioid consumption.

Keywords: VAS; 10 kHz SCS; axial back pain; chronic pain; maiden back pain; non-specific low back pain; non-surgical back pain; opioids; virgin back pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Subject datasets used for analysis. MME, morphione milligram equivalents.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Back and leg pain intensity VAS (a, c, e) and pain relief (b, d, f) for the SENZARCT sub‐group (top row) for the SENZAEU sub‐group (middle row) for the combined cohort (bottom row) at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months following implantation of the 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation system. Data are mean with error bars showing SEM. Back pain (blue) and leg pain (green).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Oswestry Disability Index (a) for individual subjects and (b) proportion of the combined cohort in each category of disability, at baseline and 12 months following 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation treatment. Crippled (red), severe (orange), moderate (pink), minimal (cream).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Opioid use categorised in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) at baseline and 12 months following 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation treatment. 0 MME (blue) 1–49 MME (green) 59–90 MME (orange) > 90 MME (brown).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018; 392: 1789–858. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, et al. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis and Rheumatology 2012; 64: 2028–37. - PubMed
    1. Maniadakis N, Gray A. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain 2000; 84: 95–103. - PubMed
    1. Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine Journal 2008; 8: 8–20. - PubMed
    1. Lambeek LC, van Tulder MW, Swinkels IC, Koppes LL, Anema JR, van Mechelen W. The trend in total cost of back pain in The Netherlands in the period 2002 to 2007. Spine 2011; 36: 1050–8. - PubMed

Publication types