Proportion of Racial Minority Patients and Patients With Low Socioeconomic Status Cared for by Physician Groups After Joining Accountable Care Organizations
- PMID: 32383749
- PMCID: PMC7210481
- DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.4439
Proportion of Racial Minority Patients and Patients With Low Socioeconomic Status Cared for by Physician Groups After Joining Accountable Care Organizations
Abstract
Importance: The incentive structure of accountable care organizations (ACOs) may lead to participating physician groups selecting fewer vulnerable patients.
Objective: To test for changes in the percentage of racial minority patients and patients with low socioeconomic status cared for by physician groups after joining the ACO.
Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort consisted of a 15% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries attributed to physician groups from 2010 to 2016. Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) participation was determined using ACO files. Analyses were conducted between January 1, 2019, and February 25, 2020.
Exposures: Using linear probability models, we conducted difference-in-differences analyses based on the year a physician group joined an ACO to estimate changes in vulnerable patients within ACO-participating groups compared with nonparticipating groups.
Main outcomes and measures: Whether the patient was black, was dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid, and poverty and unemployment rates of the patient's zip code.
Results: In a cohort of 76 717 physician groups caring for 7 307 130 patients, 16.1% of groups caring for 27.8% of patients participated in an MSSP ACO. Using 2010 characteristics, patients attributed to ACOs from 2012 to 2016, compared with those who were not, were less likely to be black (8.0% [n = 81 698] vs 9.3% [n = 270 924]) or dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid (12.8% [n = 130 957] vs 18.2% [n = 528 685]), and lived in zip codes with lower poverty rates (13.8% vs 15.5%); unemployment rates were similar (8.0% vs 8.5%). In the difference-in-differences analysis, there was no statistically significant change associated with ACO participation in the proportions of vulnerable patients attributed to ACO-participating groups compared with nonparticipating groups. After joining an ACO, ACO-participating groups had 0.0 percentage points change (95% CI, -0.1 to 0.1 percentage points; P = .59) for black patients, -0.1 percentage points (95% CI, -0.2 to 0.1 percentage points; P = .32) for patients dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid, 0.2 percentage points (95% CI, -3.5 to 4.0 percentage points; P = .91) in poverty rates, and -0.4 percentage points (95% CI, -2.0 to 1.2 percentage points; P = .62) in unemployment rates.
Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, there were no changes in the proportions of vulnerable patients cared for by ACO-participating physician groups after joining an ACO compared with changes among nonparticipating groups.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Association of Physician Group Participation in Accountable Care Organizations With Patient Social and Clinical Characteristics.JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187220. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7220. JAMA Netw Open. 2019. PMID: 30657535 Free PMC article.
-
Savings or Selection? Initial Spending Reductions in the Medicare Shared Savings Program and Considerations for Reform.Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):847-907. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12468. Epub 2020 Jul 22. Milbank Q. 2020. PMID: 32697004 Free PMC article.
-
Association Between Organizational Quality and Out-of-Network Primary Care Among Accountable Care Organizations That Care for High vs Low Proportions of Patients of Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups.JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Apr 15;3(4):e220575. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0575. eCollection 2022 Apr. JAMA Health Forum. 2022. PMID: 35977323 Free PMC article.
-
Exit Rates of Accountable Care Organizations That Serve High Proportions of Beneficiaries of Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups.JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Sep 2;3(9):e223398. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.3398. JAMA Health Forum. 2022. PMID: 36218951 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Changes in Medication Use and Adherence With Accountable Care Organization Exposure in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease or Diabetes.JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Sep 1;2(9):1019-1023. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2172. JAMA Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28700790 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The Effect of Network-Level Payment Models on Care Network Performance: A Scoping Review of the Empirical Literature.Int J Integr Care. 2022 Apr 1;22(2):3. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6002. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun. Int J Integr Care. 2022. PMID: 35431706 Free PMC article.
-
Quality improvement studies in nursing homes: a scoping review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 12;21(1):803. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06803-8. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021. PMID: 34384404 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Muhlestein D, Saunders R, Richards R, Mcclellan MB. Recent Progress In: The Value Journey: Growth Of ACOs And Value-Based Payment Models In. Health Aff Blog. August; 2018. doi:10.1377/hblog20180810.481968 - DOI
-
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Shared Savings Program fast facts as of July 1, 2019. Published 2019. Accessed July 8, 2019. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/sharedsavi...
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
