The National Institutes of Health (NIH) plays a critical role in funding scientific endeavors in biomedicine. Funding innovative science is an essential element of the NIH's mission, but many have questioned the NIH's ability to fulfill this aim. Based on an analysis of a comprehensive corpus of published biomedical research articles, we measure whether the NIH succeeds in funding work with novel ideas, which we term edge science. We find that edge science is more often NIH funded than less novel science, but with a delay. Papers that build on very recent ideas are NIH funded less often than are papers that build on ideas that have had a chance to mature for at least 7 y. We have three further findings. First, the tendency to fund edge science is mostly limited to basic science. Papers that build on novel clinical ideas are not more often NIH funded than are papers that build on well-established clinical knowledge. Second, novel papers tend to be NIH funded more often because there are more NIH-funded papers in innovative areas of investigation, rather than because the NIH funds innovative papers within research areas. Third, the NIH's tendency to have funded papers that build on the most recent advances has declined over time. In this regard, NIH funding has become more conservative despite initiatives to increase funding for innovative projects. Given our focus on published papers, the results reflect both the funding preferences of the NIH and the composition of the applications it receives.
Keywords: biomedicine; funding; ideas; novelty; science.
Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interest.
Age and the Trying Out of New Ideas.J Hum Cap. 2019 Summer;13(2):341-373. doi: 10.1086/703160. J Hum Cap. 2019. PMID: 31435457 Free PMC article.
Portfolio Analysis of Research Grants in Data Science Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.Circ Genom Precis Med. 2019 Dec;12(12):e002746. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.119.002746. Epub 2019 Nov 21. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2019. PMID: 31752505
Complex biomedical systems: from basic science to translation.IEEE Pulse. 2012 Jul;3(4):22-6. doi: 10.1109/MPUL.2012.2198733. IEEE Pulse. 2012. PMID: 22850833
Experience of King Abdul-Aziz City for science and technology in funding medical research in Saudi Arabia.Saudi Med J. 2004 Jan;25(1 Suppl):S8-12. Saudi Med J. 2004. PMID: 14968184 Review.
Diabetic nephropathy research in China: Data analysis and review from the National Natural Science Foundation of China.J Diabetes. 2015 May;7(3):307-14. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12265. Epub 2015 Apr 14. J Diabetes. 2015. PMID: 25565189 Review.