Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 7;22(7):e17338.
doi: 10.2196/17338.

Assessment of Adaptive Engagement and Support Model for People With Chronic Health Conditions in Online Health Communities: Combined Content Analysis

Affiliations

Assessment of Adaptive Engagement and Support Model for People With Chronic Health Conditions in Online Health Communities: Combined Content Analysis

Brian M Green et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: With the pervasiveness of social media, online health communities (OHCs) are an important tool for facilitating information sharing and support among people with chronic health conditions. Importantly, OHCs offer insight into conversations about the lived experiences of people with particular health conditions. Little is known about the aspects of OHCs that are important to maintain safe and productive conversations that support health.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the provision of social support and the role of active moderation in OHCs developed in accordance with and managed by an adaptive engagement model. This study also aimed to identify key elements of the model that are central to the development, maintenance, and adaptation of OHCs for people with chronic health conditions.

Methods: This study used combined content analysis, a mixed methods approach, to analyze sampled Facebook post comments from 6 OHCs to understand how key aspects of the adaptive engagement model facilitate different types of social support. OHCs included in this study are for people living with multiple sclerosis, migraine, irritable bowel syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, lung cancer, and prostate cancer. An exploratory approach was used in the analysis, and initial codes were grouped into thematic categories and then confirmed through thematic network analysis using the Dedoose qualitative analysis software tool. Thematic categories were compared for similarities and differences for each of the 6 OHCs and by topic discussed.

Results: Data on the reach and engagement of the Facebook posts and the analysis of the sample of 5881 comments demonstrate that people with chronic health conditions want to engage on the web and find value in supporting and sharing their experiences with others. Most comments made in these Facebook posts were expressions of social support for others living with the same health condition (3405/5881, 57.89%). Among the comments with an element of support, those where community members validated the knowledge or experiences of others were most frequent (1587/3405, 46.61%), followed by the expression of empathy and understanding (1089/3405, 31.98%). Even among posts with more factual content, such as insurance coverage issues, user comments still had frequent expressions of support for others (80/213, 37.5%).

Conclusions: The analysis of this OHC adaptive engagement model in action shows that the foundational elements-social support, engagement, and moderation-can effectively be used to provide a rich and dynamic community experience for individuals with chronic health conditions. Social support is demonstrated in a variety of ways, including sharing information or validating information shared by others, expressions of empathy, and sharing encouraging statements with others.

Keywords: health education; patient empowerment; qualitative research; social media; social support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: BMG, KTVH, KG, SH, and AB are employees of Health Union, LLC, whose OHCs and OHC adaptive engagement model are discussed and evaluated herein. The authors do not financially benefit from this publication.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gallant MP. The influence of social support on chronic illness self-management: a review and directions for research. Health Educ Behav. 2003 Apr;30(2):170–95. doi: 10.1177/1090198102251030. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uchino BN. Social support and health: a review of physiological processes potentially underlying links to disease outcomes. J Behav Med. 2006 Aug;29(4):377–87. doi: 10.1007/s10865-006-9056-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heaney C, Israel BA. Social networks and social support. In: Glanz K, Rimer B, Viswanath K, editors. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. Fourth Edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2008. pp. 189–210.
    1. Albrecht T, Adelman M. Communicating Social Support. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1987.
    1. Ertel KA, Glymour MM, Berkman LF. Social networks and health: a life course perspective integrating observational and experimental evidence. J Soc Pers Relatsh. 2009 May 13;26(1):73–92. doi: 10.1177/0265407509105523. - DOI