Outcomes of BAHA connect vs BAHA attract in pediatric patients
- PMID: 32497910
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110125
Outcomes of BAHA connect vs BAHA attract in pediatric patients
Abstract
Introduction: Two of the most commonly employed bone-anchored hearing implant (BAHI) systems are the BAHA Connect and BAHA Attract. The BAHA Connect uses a skin-penetrating titanium abutment. The BAHA Attract uses an implanted magnet, leaving the overlying skin intact. Limited data is available on the difference in complication rates between the two systems. Our hypothesis was that there would be no difference in complications and audiologic data.
Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed of patients who had BAHA Connect vs. Attract at our tertiary care pediatric hospital from 2006 to 2018. Pre- and post-operative information, including demographics, related diagnoses, outcomes and complications were compared between the systems using Mann-Whitney U tests and Firth logistic regression for one year post-implant. Audiology data was analyzed with Wilcoxon rank-sum and Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank tests.
Results: Twenty-four Attract and 18 Connect BAHA surgeries were identified from 37 patients. Eleven Connect patients had the surgery completed in two stages. Connect patients followed up an average of 6.5 years post-implant and 15 months for Attract. A total of 58.8% of patients with Connect surgeries had complications within a year and 82.4% had a complication by their last follow-up. Aside from magnet strength related issues, there were no major complications with Attract surgery at any time point. Patients with Connect surgeries had significantly more skin overgrowths, cultured infections, times on antibiotics, nursing phone calls, and ENT visits within the first year and for all records, p < .05. The pure-tone average was significantly lower for both Connect [unaided-M(SD) = 61.7(9.8); aided-M(SD) = 26.4(5.5) and Attract (unaided-M(SD) = 66.0(22.5); aided-M(SD) = 25.6(6.1)] after implant, p < .001.
Conclusion: Implantation of both systems lead to improved hearing outcomes with profoundly different complication rates.
Keywords: BAHA Attract; BAHA Connect; Bone anchored; Hearing aid; Osseointegrated; Transcutaneous.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest None.
Similar articles
-
Audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: Six-month results from a multicentre study.Clin Otolaryngol. 2019 Mar;44(2):144-157. doi: 10.1111/coa.13248. Epub 2018 Nov 18. Clin Otolaryngol. 2019. PMID: 30358920
-
Conversion of traditional osseointegrated bone-anchored hearing aids to the Baha® attract in four pediatric patients.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Dec;91:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.09.033. Epub 2016 Sep 26. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016. PMID: 27863639
-
Congenital aural atresia: bone-anchored hearing aid vs. external auditory canal reconstruction.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Feb;76(2):272-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.11.020. Epub 2011 Dec 15. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012. PMID: 22177319
-
Skin Necrosis After Implantation With the BAHA Attract: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Otol Neurotol. 2017 Mar;38(3):364-367. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001327. Otol Neurotol. 2017. PMID: 28072655 Review.
-
Osseointegrated Auditory Devices-Transcutaneous: Sophono and Baha Attract.Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2019 Apr;52(2):253-263. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2018.11.013. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2019. PMID: 30827359 Review.
Cited by
-
Hearing rehabilitation with Baha® transcutaneous and percutaneous systems.Codas. 2023 Oct 23;36(1):e20220271. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022271pt. eCollection 2023. Codas. 2023. PMID: 37878957 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical results of transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid comparing the C-shaped and linear incision techniques.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jun;280(6):2749-2754. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07778-w. Epub 2023 Jan 10. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023. PMID: 36625868
-
An objective bone conduction verification tool using a piezoelectric thin-film force transducer.Front Neurosci. 2022 Nov 17;16:1068682. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1068682. eCollection 2022. Front Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36466173 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment Protocol for Candidates for Bone-Anchored Hearing Devices.Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jun 14;26(4):e718-e724. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1745734. eCollection 2022 Oct. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022. PMID: 36405456 Free PMC article.
-
The Bonebridge BCI 602 Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant in Children: Objective and Subjective Benefits.J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 16;10(24):5916. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245916. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34945210 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
