Safety and efficacy of autologous tumour cell vaccines as a cancer therapeutic to treat solid tumours and haematological malignancies: a meta-analysis protocol for two systematic reviews

BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 8;10(6):e034714. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034714.

Abstract

Introduction: Autologous cancer cell vaccines are promising personalised immunotherapeutic options for solid and haematological malignancies that uses the patient's own cells to arm an immune response. Evidence suggests that among patients receiving these vaccines, those who mount an immune response against their own tumour cells have better prognosis, and a myriad of preclinical studies have demonstrated the same. Recently, two autologous cell vaccines Vigil and OncoVAX have made it to phase III clinical trials. Here, we outline a protocol to be used for two separate systematic reviews using a parallel approach for inclusion criteria, data extraction and analysis for autologous cell vaccines in (1) solid and (2) haematological malignancies. We aim to review evidence from controlled and uncontrolled interventional studies of autologous cell vaccines administered to patients with cancer to determine their historical efficacy (with or without associated adjuvants or modifications) with clinical response rates and safety outcomes being of particular importance.

Methods and analysis: We will search MEDLINE (OVID interface, including In-Process and Epub Ahead of Print), Embase (OVID interface) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley interface) for articles published from 1947 until 30 July 2018 (date search was performed). Studies will be screened first by title and abstract, then by full-text in duplicate. Interventional trials that report the use of an autologous cell vaccine to patients with cancer of any age will be included. The primary outcomes of interest in this review are clinical response (complete or overall/objective response) and safety outcomes (adverse events). Secondary outcomes include immune response, disease-free survival and overall survival. The risk of bias within studies will be assessed using the appropriate Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. If appropriate, a random effects meta-analysis will be performed to synthesise the data and report summary estimates of effect. Statistical heterogeneity will be assessed using the I2 statistic.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval is not required for this systematic review protocol as the review will solely use published literature. Results will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication and presented to relevant stakeholders and scientific meetings.

Prospero registration number: CRD42019140187.

Keywords: autologous cell vaccines; cellular immunotherapy; whole cell vaccines.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cancer Vaccines* / adverse effects
  • Cancer Vaccines* / therapeutic use
  • Hematologic Neoplasms* / therapy
  • Humans
  • Meta-Analysis as Topic
  • Neoplasms* / therapy
  • Systematic Reviews as Topic

Substances

  • Cancer Vaccines