Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in nasal polyposis: 2 randomized phase 3 trials
- PMID: 32524991
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.05.032
Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in nasal polyposis: 2 randomized phase 3 trials
Erratum in
-
Corrigenda.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Jan;147(1):416. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.11.003. Epub 2021 Jan 5. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021. PMID: 33436165 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is characterized by IgE hyperproduction and eosinophilic inflammation. The anti-IgE antibody, omalizumab, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with CRSwNP and comorbid asthma previously.
Objective: Our aim was to determine omalizumab safety and efficacy in CRSwNP in phase 3 trials (POLYP 1 and POLYP 2).
Methods: Adults with CRSwNP with inadequate response to intranasal corticosteroids were randomized (1:1) to omalizumab or placebo and intranasal mometasone for 24 weeks. Coprimary end points included change from baseline to week 24 in Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) and Nasal Congestion Score. Secondary end points included change from baseline to week 24 in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) score, University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test, sense of smell, postnasal drip, runny nose, and adverse events.
Results: Patients in POLYP 1 (n = 138) and POLYP 2 (n = 127) exhibited severe CRSwNP and substantial quality of life impairment evidenced by a mean NPS higher than 6 and SNOT-22 score of approximately 60. Both studies met both the coprimary end points. SNOT-22 score, University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test score, sense of smell, postnasal drip, and runny nose were also significantly improved for omalizumab versus placebo. In POLYP 1 and POLYP 2, the mean changes from baseline at week 24 for omalizumab versus placebo were as follows: NPS, -1.08 versus 0.06 (P < .0001) and -0.90 versus -0.31 (P = .0140); Nasal Congestion Score, -0.89 versus -0.35 (P = .0004) and -0.70 versus -0.20 (P = .0017); and SNOT-22 score, -24.7 versus -8.6 (P < .0001) and -21.6 versus -6.6 (P < .0001). Adverse events were similar between groups.
Conclusion: Omalizumab significantly improved endoscopic, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes in severe CRSwNP with inadequate response to intranasal corticosteroids, and it was well tolerated.
Keywords: IgE; Nasal polyps; allergy; asthma; nasal obstruction; omalizumab; quality of life; rhinosinusitis.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Reply.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Jan;147(1):413-414. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.09.025. Epub 2020 Nov 5. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021. PMID: 33160643 No abstract available.
-
Omalizumab or dupilumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Jan;147(1):413. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.09.024. Epub 2020 Nov 5. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021. PMID: 33160644 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Long-term efficacy and safety of omalizumab for nasal polyposis in an open-label extension study.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Mar;149(3):957-965.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.07.045. Epub 2021 Sep 14. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022. PMID: 34530020 Clinical Trial.
-
Biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 12;3(3):CD013513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013513.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33710614 Free PMC article.
-
Defining the Efficacy of Omalizumab in Nasal Polyposis: A POLYP 1 and POLYP 2 Subgroup Analysis.Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2022 Jan;36(1):135-141. doi: 10.1177/19458924211030486. Epub 2021 Aug 12. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2022. PMID: 34382434 Clinical Trial.
-
Intranasal steroids versus placebo or no intervention for chronic rhinosinusitis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4(4):CD011996. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011996.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27115217 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Different types of intranasal steroids for chronic rhinosinusitis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4(4):CD011993. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011993.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27115215 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Assessing the Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Routine Clinical Care of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patients: A Canadian Perspective.J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Jan-Dec;53:19160216241288806. doi: 10.1177/19160216241288806. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024. PMID: 39415404 Free PMC article.
-
Reduced Sense of Smell in Patients with Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis and its Implications for Diagnosis and Management: A Narrative Review.Adv Ther. 2024 Dec;41(12):4384-4395. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02984-w. Epub 2024 Oct 9. Adv Ther. 2024. PMID: 39382822 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Improvement in health-related quality of life questionnaires with biologic treatment in severe asthma and comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyposis: a real-life experience.Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2407523. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2407523. Epub 2024 Oct 7. Ann Med. 2024. PMID: 39373532 Free PMC article.
-
Canadian Real-World Study Long-Term Clinical Results Using Dupilumab for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Polyps.J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Jan-Dec;53:19160216241278659. doi: 10.1177/19160216241278659. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024. PMID: 39345032 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation of sino-nasal outcome test and nasal polyp score in dupilumab-treated chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Sep 21. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08973-7. Online ahead of print. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 39306591
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
