The Role of Minimal Access Surgery in the Treatment of Spinal Metastatic Tumors
- PMID: 32528811
- PMCID: PMC7263343
- DOI: 10.1177/2192568219895265
The Role of Minimal Access Surgery in the Treatment of Spinal Metastatic Tumors
Abstract
Study design: Literature review.
Objective: To provide an overview of the recent advances in minimal access surgery (MAS) for spinal metastases.
Methods: Literature review.
Results: Experience gained from MAS in the trauma, degenerative and deformity settings has paved the road for MAS techniques for spinal cancer. Current MAS techniques for the treatment of spinal metastases include percutaneous instrumentation, mini-open approaches for decompression and tumor resection with or without tubular/expandable retractors and thoracoscopy/endoscopy. Cancer care requires a multidisciplinary effort and adherence to treatment algorithms facilitates decision making, ultimately improving patient outcomes. Specific algorithms exist to help guide decisions for MAS for extradural spinal metastases. One major paradigm shift has been the implementation of percutaneous stabilization for treatment of neoplastic spinal instability. Percutaneous stabilization can be enhanced with cement augmentation for increased durability and pain palliation. Unlike osteoporotic fractures, kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty are known to be effective therapies for symptomatic pathologic compression fractures as supported by high level evidence. The integration of systemic body radiation therapy for spinal metastases has eliminated the need for aggressive tumor resection allowing implementation of MAS epidural tumor decompression via tubular or expandable retractors and preliminary data exist regarding laser interstitial thermal therapy and radiofrequency ablation for tumor control. Neuronavigation and robotic systems offer increased precision, facilitating the role of MAS for spinal metastases.
Conclusions: MAS has a significant role in the treatment of spinal metastases. This review highlights the current utilization of minimally invasive surgical strategies for treatment of spinal metastases.
Keywords: minimal access surgery; minimally invasive surgery; spine; surgery; tumor.
© The Author(s) 2019.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr Barzilai has nothing to disclose. Dr Bilsky reports speaker’s bureau from Globus, Varian, and BrainLab, outside the submitted work. In addition, Dr Bilsky has a patent Globus CREO with royalties paid, and a patent Depuy PEEK/carbon fiber cage with royalties paid. Dr Laufer reports consulting fees from Globus, DePuy/Synthes, BrainLab, Medtronic, Inc, and SpineWave, outside the submitted work.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Minimal Access Surgery for Spinal Metastases: Prospective Evaluation of a Treatment Algorithm Using Patient-Reported Outcomes.World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:e889-e901. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.182. Epub 2018 Sep 4. World Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 30189298 Free PMC article.
-
Short-segment cement-augmented fixation in open separation surgery of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: initial experience.Neurosurg Focus. 2021 May;50(5):E11. doi: 10.3171/2021.2.FOCUS217. Neurosurg Focus. 2021. PMID: 33932919
-
Minimally Invasive Muscle Sparing Posterior-Only Approach for Lumbar Circumferential Decompression and Stabilization to Treat Spine Metastasis--Technical Report.World Neurosurg. 2015 Nov;84(5):1484-90. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.06.018. Epub 2015 Jun 20. World Neurosurg. 2015. PMID: 26100166
-
Percutaneous Minimally Invasive Techniques in the Treatment of Spinal Metastases.Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2016 Nov;17(11):56. doi: 10.1007/s11864-016-0433-1. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27627999 Review.
-
10-Year Trends in the Surgical Management of Patients with Spinal Metastases: A Scoping Review.World Neurosurg. 2022 Jan;157:170-186.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.086. Epub 2021 Oct 13. World Neurosurg. 2022. PMID: 34655822 Review.
Cited by
-
Local Recurrence and Development of Spinal Cord Syndrome during Follow-Up after Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Spine Disease.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 27;15(19):4749. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194749. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37835444 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment progress of spinal metastatic cancer: a powerful tool for improving the quality of life of the patients.J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Aug 3;18(1):563. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03975-3. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023. PMID: 37537684 Free PMC article.
-
The Role and Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Spine Surgery of Treating Spinal Metastases; Outcomes of 29 Cases From 8 Countries.Neurospine. 2023 Jun;20(2):608-619. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346274.137. Epub 2023 Jun 30. Neurospine. 2023. PMID: 37401080 Free PMC article.
-
Three-dimensional simulation/printing-assisted surgery for symptomatic metastatic epidural spinal cord compression of posterior column: efficacy assessment based on 2-year follow-up.Front Surg. 2023 May 26;10:1177280. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1177280. eCollection 2023. Front Surg. 2023. PMID: 37304181 Free PMC article.
-
The Evolution of Minimally Invasive Spine Tumor Resection and Stabilization: From K-Wires to Navigated One-Step Screws.J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 9;12(2):536. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020536. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36675466 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hansen-Algenstaedt N, Kwan MK, Algenstaedt P, et al. Comparison between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for patients with spinal metastasis: a prospective propensity score-matched study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42:789–797. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001893 - PubMed
-
- Hikata T, Isogai N, Shiono Y, et al. A retrospective cohort study comparing the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive versus open surgical techniques in the treatment of spinal metastases. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30:e1082–e1087. doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000000460 - PubMed
-
- Kumar N, Malhotra R, Maharajan K, et al. Metastatic spine tumor surgery: a comparative study of minimally invasive approach using percutaneous pedicle screws fixation versus open approach. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30:E1015–E1021. doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000000400 - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
