Reoperation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An Analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database
- PMID: 32535005
- PMCID: PMC7354233
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.029
Reoperation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An Analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to report the largest series of patients receiving a surgical reoperation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database.
Background: TAVR has become an effective means of treating aortic stenosis. As TAVR is used in progressively lower-risk cohorts, management of device failure will become increasingly important.
Methods: The STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database was queried for patients with a history of prior TAVR undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement from 2011 to 2015. Observed-to-expected (O/E) mortality ratios were determined to facilitate comparison across reoperative indications and timing from index TAVR procedure.
Results: A total of 123 patients met inclusion criteria (median age 77 years) with an STS Predicted Risk of Mortality of 4%, 4% to 8%, and >8% in 17%, 24%, and 59%, respectively. Median time to reoperation was 2.5 (interquartile range: 0.7 to 13.0) months, and the operative mortality rate was 17.1%. Common indications for reoperation included early TAVR device failures such as paravalvular leak (15%), structural prosthetic deterioration (11%), failed repair (11%), sizing or position issues (11%), and prosthetic valve endocarditis (10%). All pre-operative risk categories were associated with an increased O/E mortality ratio (Predicted Risk of Mortality <4%: O/E 5.5; 4% to 8%: O/E 1.7; >8%: O/E 1.2).
Conclusions: SAVR following early failure of TAVR, while rare, is associated with worse-than-expected outcomes as compared with similar patients initially undergoing SAVR. Continued experience with this developing technology is needed to reduce the incidence of early TAVR failure and further define optimal treatment of failed TAVR prostheses.
Keywords: SAVR; TAVR; device failure; surgical aortic valve replacement; transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Reoperation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Breaking Up Is Hard to Do.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul 13;13(13):1526-1528. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.045. Epub 2020 Jun 10. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. PMID: 32535009 No abstract available.
-
Uncertainty in Uncertainty: How Risky Is Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement After TAVR?JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Aug 24;13(16):1964-1965. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.06.046. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. PMID: 32819488 No abstract available.
-
Reply: Uncertainty in Uncertainty: How Risky Is Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement After TAVR?JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Aug 24;13(16):1965. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.07.002. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. PMID: 32819490 No abstract available.
-
Reply: Redo SAVR After Primary TAVR, A Dangerous Sequence?JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep 28;13(18):2186-2187. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.08.013. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. PMID: 32972580 No abstract available.
-
Redo SAVR After Primary TAVR, A Dangerous Sequence?JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep 28;13(18):2186. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.08.005. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. PMID: 32972581 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-surgical-risk patients: An updated meta-analysis.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul;96(1):169-178. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28520. Epub 2019 Oct 21. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. PMID: 31631514
-
Impact of Flow on Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Aug;14(8):e012364. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.012364. Epub 2021 Aug 13. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021. PMID: 34387097
-
Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Patients at High Risk for Surgery: A Study of Echocardiographic Change and Risk Prediction.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6):e003426. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003426. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016. PMID: 27313280 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis patients at low to moderate surgical risk: a comprehensive meta-analysis.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Aug 24;17(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0668-1. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017. PMID: 28836953 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transcatheter Valve Replacement: Risk Levels and Contemporary Outcomes.Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2017 Jul-Sep;13(3):126-131. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-13-3-126. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2017. PMID: 29743997 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of implantation height on the performance of a redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a balloon-expandable valve.JTCVS Open. 2024 Mar 8;19:61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.02.021. eCollection 2024 Jun. JTCVS Open. 2024. PMID: 39015440 Free PMC article.
-
Catheter-Based Interventions for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease During Pregnancy.JACC Adv. 2022 Apr 27;1(2):100022. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100022. eCollection 2022 Jun. JACC Adv. 2022. PMID: 38939308 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Balloon-Expandable Valve for the Treatment of Self-Expanding Valve Failure: The Need for a Tailored Approach.JACC Case Rep. 2024 May 14;29(13):102388. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2024.102388. eCollection 2024 Jul 3. JACC Case Rep. 2024. PMID: 38912321 Free PMC article.
-
Valve Type and Operative Risks in Surgical Explantation of Transcatheter Aortic Valves: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 23;13(5):1262. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051262. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38592075 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: From Pre-Procedural Planning to Procedural Scenarios and Possible Complications.J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 7;13(2):341. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020341. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38256475 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Thourani VH, Kodali S, Makkar RR, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: a propensity score analysis. Lancet. 2016;387(10034):2218–2225. - PubMed
-
- Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Who Cannot Undergo Surgery. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;363(17):1597–1607. - PubMed
-
- Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;374(17):1609–1620. - PubMed
-
- Latib A, Naim C, De Bonis M, et al. TAVR-associated prosthetic valve infective endocarditis: results of a large, multicenter registry. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014;64(20):2176–2178. - PubMed
-
- Mylotte D, Piazza N. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement failure: deja vu ou jamais vu? Circulation Cardiovascular interventions. 2015;8(4). - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
