1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of Pig Seminal Plasma Reveals Intra-Ejaculate Variation in Metabolites
- PMID: 32549232
- PMCID: PMC7355445
- DOI: 10.3390/biom10060906
1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of Pig Seminal Plasma Reveals Intra-Ejaculate Variation in Metabolites
Abstract
In pigs, ejaculate is expelled in fractions, mainly the sperm-rich fraction (SRF) and the post-SRF (PSRF), which differ in both sperm content and origin. In addition, intra-ejaculate variability between fractions in terms of sperm reproductive characteristics has been previously reported, the highest sperm quality being observed in the first 10 mL of the SRF (SRF-P1). As seminal plasma (SP) composition has been purported to influence sperm physiology, the aim of this study was to profile pig SP metabolite composition and to find putative differences between the ejaculate portions (SRF-P1, the rest of SRF [SRF-P2], PSRF) and entire ejaculate (EE). To this end, ejaculates (n = 8, one per boar) were collected in fractions and SP was analyzed using 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy. We identified 19 metabolites present in all ejaculate portions and the EE, and reported correlations between the metabolites. Additionally, and for the first time in mammals, we found intra-ejaculate variability in the SP metabolites, observing different relative abundances in choline, glycerophosphocholine and glycine. Regarding their influence in sperm physiology, we hypothesize that these metabolites may explain the specific reproductive characteristics of each ejaculate portion. Finally, the reported SP metabolites could serve as a first steppingstone in the study of quality, functionality, and fertility biomarkers.
Keywords: intra-ejaculate variability; metabolites; nuclear magnetic resonance; pig; seminal plasma.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Aldose Reductase B1 in Pig Seminal Plasma: Identification, Localization in Reproductive Tissues, and Relationship With Quality and Sperm Preservation.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Jun 8;9:683199. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.683199. eCollection 2021. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021. PMID: 34169077 Free PMC article.
-
Seminal plasma antioxidants are directly involved in boar sperm cryotolerance.Theriogenology. 2018 Feb;107:27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.10.035. Epub 2017 Oct 31. Theriogenology. 2018. PMID: 29128698
-
Boar sperm cryosurvival is better after exposure to seminal plasma from selected fractions than to those from entire ejaculate.Cryobiology. 2014 Oct;69(2):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 15. Cryobiology. 2014. PMID: 25037026
-
The physiological roles of the boar ejaculate.Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2009;66:1-21. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2009. PMID: 19848263 Review.
-
New Approaches to Boar Semen Evaluation, Processing and Improvement.Reprod Domest Anim. 2015 Jul;50 Suppl 2:11-9. doi: 10.1111/rda.12554. Reprod Domest Anim. 2015. PMID: 26174914 Review.
Cited by
-
Chromatin condensation but not DNA integrity of pig sperm is greater in the sperm-rich fraction.J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2023 Nov 6;14(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s40104-023-00938-w. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2023. PMID: 37926841 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of inclusion of post-spermatic ejaculate fraction in boar seminal doses on sperm metabolism, quality, and interaction with uterine fluid.Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 14;13(1):15258. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42254-3. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37709904 Free PMC article.
-
Should All Fractions of the Boar Ejaculate Be Prepared for Insemination Rather Than Using the Sperm Rich Only?Biology (Basel). 2022 Jan 28;11(2):210. doi: 10.3390/biology11020210. Biology (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35205077 Free PMC article.
-
Relevance of the Ejaculate Fraction and Dilution Method on Boar Sperm Quality during Processing and Conservation of Seminal Doses.Vet Sci. 2021 Nov 27;8(12):292. doi: 10.3390/vetsci8120292. Vet Sci. 2021. PMID: 34941819 Free PMC article.
-
Aldose Reductase B1 in Pig Seminal Plasma: Identification, Localization in Reproductive Tissues, and Relationship With Quality and Sperm Preservation.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Jun 8;9:683199. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.683199. eCollection 2021. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021. PMID: 34169077 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Parrilla I., Del Olmo D., Sijses L., Martinez-Alborcia M.J., Cuello C., Vazquez J.M., Martinez E.A., Roca J. Differences in the ability of spermatozoa from individual boar ejaculates to withstand different Semen-Processing techniques. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2012;132:66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.04.003. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
