Comparing Interventions for Management of Hot Flashes in Patients With Breast and Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses

Oncol Nurs Forum. 2020 Jul 1;47(4):E86-E106. doi: 10.1188/20.ONF.E86-E106.

Abstract

Problem identification: Hot flashes are common and bothersome in patients with breast and prostate cancer and can adversely affect patients' quality of life.

Literature search: Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of one or more interventions for hot flashes in patients with a history of breast or prostate cancer.

Data evaluation: Outcomes of interest included changes in hot flash severity, hot flash frequency, quality of life, and harms. Pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analyses were performed where feasible, with narrative synthesis used where required.

Synthesis: 40 RCTs were included. Findings from network meta-analysis for hot flash frequency suggested that several therapies may offer benefits compared to no treatment, but little data suggested differences between active therapies. Findings from network meta-analysis for hot flash score were similar.

Implications for research: Although many interventions may offer improvements for hot flashes versus no treatment, minimal data suggest important differences between therapies.

Supplementary materials can be found by visiting https: //bit.ly/2WGzi30.

Keywords: breast cancer; hot flashes; meta-analysis; prostate cancer; systematic review.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Breast Neoplasms / complications*
  • Female
  • Hot Flashes / etiology*
  • Hot Flashes / therapy*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Menopause / physiology*
  • Middle Aged
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / complications*
  • Quality of Life / psychology*