Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 5:11:1033.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01033. eCollection 2020.

Rethinking the Relationships Between Time Perspectives and Well-Being: Four Hypothetical Models Conceptualizing the Dynamic Interplay Between Temporal Framing and Mechanisms Boosting Mental Well-Being

Affiliations

Rethinking the Relationships Between Time Perspectives and Well-Being: Four Hypothetical Models Conceptualizing the Dynamic Interplay Between Temporal Framing and Mechanisms Boosting Mental Well-Being

Bozena Burzynska et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Time perspective (TP) is a central aspect of human daily psychological functioning, with a pronounced impact on human thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. The particular TP dimensions are strongly associated with a range of various mental well-being indicators and were shown to predict as much as 40% of their variance. However, the relationship between TPs and specific mechanisms that enhance mental well-being still requires further exploration. In the present article, we conceptually analyze a potential interplay of TPs and three well-confirmed well-being "boosters" (WBBs)-gratitude, savoring the moment, and prioritizing positivity-which may prove responsible for the vital effects of TP on mental well-being. Each of the "boosters" has a clear temporal anchoring: gratitude stems from the appreciation of the past, savoring the moment refers mainly to the experience of the present, and prioritizing positivity engages planning behaviors that require future focus. We propose four theoretical models to be verified in further experimental research. The first model, the trait-behavior model, proposes that trait TPs increase the tendency to use particular WBBs in order to increase mental well-being. The second model, referred to as the accumulation model, offers that TPs mediate between WBBs and mental well-being; and finally, a regular practice of a specific WBB develops a specific TP (e.g., exercising a gratitude intervention enhances past-positive TP). The third model, the feedback loop, suggests that WBBs and TPs strengthen one another and contribute to higher mental well-being. The last model, which can be called the match-mismatch model, presents the influence of WBBs on mental well-being, where a particular TP plays a role of a moderator (e.g., present-hedonistic TP moderates the relationship between savoring and well-being). Implications of potential confirmation of each of the models for theory and practice are also discussed.

Keywords: gratitude; prioritizing positivity; savoring the moment; time perspective; well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The general conceptual model illustrating the hypothesized effects of time perspectives on well-being boosting behaviors (WBBs; which are gratitude, savoring the moment, and prioritizing positivity) and mental well-being.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The trait-behavior model; TP, times perspective; WBB, well-being booster. Dashed line indicates that mechanisms other than given WBB may in parallel mediate the effect.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Accumulation model; WBB, well-being booster; TP, times perspective. Dashed line indicates that mechanisms other than given TP may in parallel mediate the effect.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Feedback loop model. TPt1 and TPt2, time points for a particular time perspective; WBBt1 and WBBt2, time points for a particular well-being booster.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Match – mismatch model; TP, time perspective; WBB, well-being booster behavior. The dashed line indicates that a direct association between WBB and TP is possible but not necessary for the occurrence of an interaction effect.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Algoe S. B., Haidt J., Gable S. L. (2008). Beyond reciprocity: gratitude and relationships in everyday life. Emotion 8 425–429. 10.1037/1528-3542.8.3.425 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allemand M., Hill P. L., Ghaemmaghami P., Martin M. (2012). Forgivingness and subjective well-being in adulthood: the moderating role of future time perspective. J. Res. Pers. 46 32–39. 10.1016/j.jrp.2011.11.004 - DOI
    1. Boehm J. K., Lyubomirsky S. (2009). “The promise of sustainable happiness,” in The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology, eds Snyder C. R., Lopez S. J. (Oxford: OUP; ), 667–677.
    1. Boniwell I., Osin E., Alex L. P., Ivanchenko G. V. (2010). A question of balance: time perspective and well-being in British and Russian samples. The Journal of Positive Psychology 5 24–40. 10.1080/17439760903271181 - DOI
    1. Boniwell I., Osin E., Sircova A. (2014). Introducing time perspective coaching: a new approach to improve time management and enhance well-being. Int. J. Evid. Based Coach. Mentor. 12 24–40.