Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 26;16(6):e1007981.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007981. eCollection 2020 Jun.

The genome polishing tool POLCA makes fast and accurate corrections in genome assemblies

Affiliations

The genome polishing tool POLCA makes fast and accurate corrections in genome assemblies

Aleksey V Zimin et al. PLoS Comput Biol. .

Abstract

The introduction of third-generation DNA sequencing technologies in recent years has allowed scientists to generate dramatically longer sequence reads, which when used in whole-genome sequencing projects have yielded better repeat resolution and far more contiguous genome assemblies. While the promise of better contiguity has held true, the relatively high error rate of long reads, averaging 8-15%, has made it challenging to generate a highly accurate final sequence. Current long-read sequencing technologies display a tendency toward systematic errors, in particular in homopolymer regions, which present additional challenges. A cost-effective strategy to generate highly contiguous assemblies with a very low overall error rate is to combine long reads with low-cost short-read data, which currently have an error rate below 0.5%. This hybrid strategy can be pursued either by incorporating the short-read data into the early phase of assembly, during the read correction step, or by using short reads to "polish" the consensus built from long reads. In this report, we present the assembly polishing tool POLCA (POLishing by Calling Alternatives) and compare its performance with two other popular polishing programs, Pilon and Racon. We show that on simulated data POLCA is more accurate than Pilon, and comparable in accuracy to Racon. On real data, all three programs show similar performance, but POLCA is consistently much faster than either of the other polishing programs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Upper panel (a) shows the results for POLCA, Pilon, Racon, and NextPolish in correcting simulated errors for five different experiments with different numbers of errors introduced into an assembly of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. Lower panel (b) shows the running times (wall clock time) of each program, measured on a 16-core AMD Opteron system with 128Gb of RAM, running with 16 threads. The run times do not include the time spent on mapping the reads, which was the same for all programs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Completing bacterial genome assemblies with multiplex MinION sequencing. Microbial Genomics. 2017. October;3(10). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berlin K, Koren S, Chin CS, Drake JP, Landolin JM, Phillippy AM. Assembling large genomes with single-molecule sequencing and locality-sensitive hashing. Nature Biotechnology. 2015. June;33(6):623 10.1038/nbt.3238 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zimin AV, Puiu D, Luo MC, Zhu T, Koren S, Marçais G, et al. Hybrid assembly of the large and highly repetitive genome of Aegilops tauschii, a progenitor of bread wheat, with the MaSuRCA mega-reads algorithm. Genome Research. 2017. May 1;27(5):787–92. 10.1101/gr.213405.116 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PloS ONE. 2014. November 19;9(11):e112963 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vaser R, Sović I, Nagarajan N, Šikić M. Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Research. 2017. May 1;27(5):737–46. 10.1101/gr.214270.116 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types