Interventions in Post-Intensive Care Syndrome-Family: A Systematic Literature Review

Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep;48(9):e835-e840. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004450.

Abstract

Objectives: Data show that family members of ICU patients may have high levels of anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress disorders, and/or complicated grief. This was previously referred to as post-intensive care syndrome-family. We systematically review randomized controlled trials for post-intensive care syndrome-family.

Data sources: Systematic research in databases (Pubmed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINHAL for articles published between January 2000 and October 2019).

Study selection: Interventions in randomized controlled trials for post-intensive care syndrome-family in relatives of adult ICU patients.

Data extraction: Review, quality assessment, and risk assessment for bias of eligible publications were performed along recommended guidelines for each investigation. Quality assessment graded studies into "strong" (n = 5), "moderate" (n = 4), and "weak" (n = 2).

Data synthesis: Out of 2,399 publications, 11 investigations were found eligible (3,183 relatives of ICU patients). Studies addressed interventions during ICU stay (n = 6), during the post-ICU period (n = 4), or both (n = 1). Two studies included relatives of dying/deceased patients. One study implemented end-of-life conferences and showed reduced prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (45% vs 69%; p = 0.01), anxiety (45% vs 67%; p = 0.02), and depression (29% vs 56%; p = 0.003). Family conferences with a physician and proactive participation of a nurse reduced anxiety-scores (p = 0.01) without reducing anxiety prevalence (33.3% vs 52.3%; p = 0.08). Other studies failed to improve symptoms or reduce prevalence of post-intensive care syndrome-family. Interestingly, condolence letters may even increase prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (52.4% vs 37.1%; p = 0.03). Meetings without the presence of ICU physicians were shown to increase Impact of Event Scale-Revised scores (25.9 vs 21.3; p = 0.0495).

Conclusions: Only few data are available on interventions for post-intensive care syndrome-family. It appears that proactive communication and provision of information seems pivotal for post-intensive care syndrome-family treatment. Interestingly, some interventions may even worsen post-intensive care syndrome-family. In the light of the relevance of post-intensive care syndrome-family in daily ICU care, more high-quality data seems urgently needed.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Anxiety / epidemiology
  • Anxiety / therapy
  • Critical Illness / epidemiology*
  • Critical Illness / psychology
  • Depression / epidemiology
  • Depression / therapy
  • Family / psychology*
  • Humans
  • Mental Health*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic / epidemiology
  • Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic / therapy
  • Terminal Care / organization & administration
  • Terminal Care / psychology

Supplementary concepts

  • postintensive care syndrome