Graduate medical education funding mechanisms, challenges, and solutions: A narrative review

Am J Surg. 2020 Jun 23;S0002-9610(20)30359-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.06.007. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Background: With increased attention on the federal budget deficit, graduate medical education (GME) funding has in particular been targeted as a potential source of cost reduction. Reduced GME funding can further deteriorate the compensation of physicians during their residency training.

Methods: In order to understand the GME funding mechanisms and current challenges, as well as the value of the work accomplished by residents, we searched peer-reviewed, English language studies published between 2000 and 2019.

Results: Direct and indirect GME funding is intended to support resident reimbursement and the higher costs associated with supporting a teaching program. However, policy efforts have aimed to reduce federal funding for GME. Furthermore, evidence suggests that residents are inadequately compensated because their salaries do not reflect the number of hours worked and are not comparable to those of other medical staff.

Conclusions: Our review suggests that creative solutions are needed to diversify GME funding and improve resident compensation.

Keywords: Funding; Graduate medical education; Resident compensation.

Publication types

  • Review