Relationships and boundaries: Learning needs and preferences in clerkship medical environments

PLoS One. 2020 Jul 20;15(7):e0236145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236145. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Purpose: Relationship boundaries recognition is an essential element of medical practice. The aim of the study was to assess final year medical students' perceived need for education regarding professional boundaries.

Materials and methods: This was a cross-sectional study. An anonymous paper questionnaire was distributed to 128 final year medical students. Standard descriptive statistics, unpaired t-test to evaluate differences between male and female groups and Pearson correlation to determine relationships between variables were used.

Results: The survey was completed by 84.4% of students who identified the need for more emphasis in the curriculum for all of topics during training and practice pertaining to boundaries and relationships (mean 6.61±1.32 on a scale of 0 to 9; and 6.66±1.27 respectively). Topics with a high interest ranking requiring additional attention were mistreatment of medical students (mean 7.22±1.96), coping with mistakes in clinical care (mean 7.25±1.63), reporting of medical mistakes (mean 7.58±1.36), and gender bias in clinical care (mean 7.10±1.82). Women perceived a greater need for attention to all topics in the curriculum. Significant differences between the perceptions of female and male students were observed regarding topics such as responding to an impaired colleague (p<0.001), and a physician's social responsibilities (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: Medical students recognized the need for more education and training in the undergraduate medical ethics curriculum regarding patient-physician relationship boundaries.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Clinical Clerkship*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Ethics, Medical
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Learning*
  • Male
  • Physician-Patient Relations / ethics*
  • Sex Factors
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.