Comparison of Dexmedetomidine, Lidocaine, and Fentanyl in Attenuation Hemodynamic Response of Laryngoscopy and Intubation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

Maziar Mahjoubifard; Mehdi Heidari; Maryam Dahmardeh; Seyed Bashir Mirtajani; Alireza Jahangirifard

doi:10.1155/2020/4814037

Comparison of Dexmedetomidine, Lidocaine, and Fentanyl in Attenuation Hemodynamic Response of Laryngoscopy and Intubation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2020 Jul 1:2020:4814037. doi: 10.1155/2020/4814037. eCollection 2020.

Authors

Maziar Mahjoubifard¹, Mehdi Heidari¹, Maryam Dahmardeh¹, Seyed Bashir Mirtajani², Alireza Jahangirifard³

Affiliations

¹ Fellowship of Cardiac Anesthesia, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
² Mycobacteriology Research Center (MRC), National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
³ Chronic Respiratory Disease Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Materials and methods: This clinical trial was conducted on 90 patients, aged 30-70 years, who had heart surgery. The participants were categorized into three groups. Group D received 1 µg/kg intravenous dexmedetomidine in 10 minutes, group L received 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine (1%) 90 seconds before intubation, and group F received 2 µg/kg fentanyl. The vital signs (HR, SBP, DBP, and MAP) were measured before intubation and 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 10th minutes after intubation. Data were analyzed with SPSS 19 software (chi-square, one-way ANOVA, or Kruskal-Wallis).

Results: The age (P=0.389) and gender distributions of patients were similar in all three groups. Dexmedetomidine significantly attenuated HR in the 3^rd (P=0.001), 5^th (P=0.001), and 10^th (P=0.003) minutes after intervention. It also reduced the systolic blood pressure in the 5^th (P=0.024) and 10^th (P=0.006) minutes. This reduction was significantly higher in the dexmedetomidine group than that in the two other groups. In addition, dexmedetomidine caused a greater reduction in MAP in the 1^st (P=0.048), 5^th (P=0.0001), and 10^th (P=0.0001) minutes. Discussion. All three medications were effective in controlling HR; however, dexmedetomidine caused bradycardia in the 3^rd, 5^th, and 10^th minutes. Lidocaine resulted in an increase in MAP in the 1^st minute after intubation; whereas, dexmedetomidine reduced MAP at the 5^th and 10^th minutes after intubation. Changes in blood pressure and mean arterial pressure in the fentanyl group was lower than the two other groups.

Conclusion: As a result, dexmedetomidine was not suitable for hemodynamic control and led to hypotension and bradycardia; on the other hand, fentanyl was more effective than two other medications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This trial is registered with IRCT2017013132320N1.