Comparison of Unsupervised Home Self-collected Midnasal Swabs With Clinician-Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection
- PMID: 32697321
- PMCID: PMC7376392
- DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16382
Comparison of Unsupervised Home Self-collected Midnasal Swabs With Clinician-Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection
Abstract
This diagnostic study compares unsupervised home self-collected midnasal swabs vs clinician-collected nasopharyngeal swabs for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
A combined oropharyngeal/nares swab is a suitable alternative to nasopharyngeal swabs for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.J Clin Virol. 2020 Jul;128:104442. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104442. Epub 2020 May 16. J Clin Virol. 2020. PMID: 32540034 Free PMC article.
-
Is Nasopharyngeal Swab Comparable With Nasopharyngeal Aspirate to Detect SARS-CoV-2 in Children?Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020 Sep;39(9):e288-e289. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002824. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020. PMID: 32740453 No abstract available.
-
Value of swab types and collection time on SARS-COV-2 detection using RT-PCR assay.J Virol Methods. 2020 Dec;286:113974. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113974. Epub 2020 Sep 16. J Virol Methods. 2020. PMID: 32949663 Free PMC article.
-
Upper respiratory tract sampling in COVID-19.Malays J Pathol. 2020 Apr;42(1):23-35. Malays J Pathol. 2020. PMID: 32342928 Review.
-
Access to lifesaving medical resources for African countries: COVID-19 testing and response, ethics, and politics.Lancet. 2020 May 30;395(10238):1735-1738. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31093-X. Epub 2020 May 7. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 32386564 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Self-swabbing versus assisted swabbing for viral detection by qRT-PCR: the experience from SARS-CoV-2 based on a meta-analysis of six prospectively designed evaluations conducted in a UK setting.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Aug;43(8):1621-1630. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-04866-z. Epub 2024 Jun 10. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024. PMID: 38856828 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of RT-PCR and antigen test sensitivity across nasopharyngeal, nares, and oropharyngeal swab, and saliva sample types during the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant.Heliyon. 2024 Feb 29;10(6):e27188. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27188. eCollection 2024 Mar 30. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38500996 Free PMC article.
-
Tiny swabs: nasal swabs integrated into tube caps facilitate large-scale self-collected SARS-CoV-2 testing.J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Feb 14;62(2):e0128523. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01285-23. Epub 2023 Dec 22. J Clin Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 38131692 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Tests With Self-Collected vs Health Care Worker-Collected Nasal and Throat Swab Specimens: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2344295. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44295. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 38055280 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of Self-Collected, Ambient Temperature-Preserved Nasal Swabs Compared to Samples Collected by Trained Staff for Genotyping of Respiratory Viruses by Shotgun RNA Sequencing: Comparative Study.JMIR Form Res. 2023 Nov 24;7:e32848. doi: 10.2196/32848. JMIR Form Res. 2023. PMID: 37999952 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
