Objectives: This study evaluates the accuracy of continuous blood pressure monitoring using pulse contour technology with the ClearSight monitoring device, a noninvasive alternative to placing an invasive arterial line, in pediatric patients.
Methods: Children younger than 18 years admitted to a pediatric ICU, who required an arterial line, and fit into the ClearSight finger cuff were included. Blood pressure measurement for systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures (MAP) obtained by the ClearSight device were compared with those obtained with the intra-arterial catheter as well as automated cuff measurements using the mixed-effects model. Analysis was conducted for entire cohort, and measurements obtained with and without vasopressor use.
Results: There were 213 measurements from 10 patients. There was a statistically significant difference in systolic blood pressure when comparing arterial line and ClearSight systolic and diastolic measurements between the two methods (P < 0.001). There was no statistical difference between arterial MAP and ClearSight MAP (P = 0.957). Results were similar when ClearSight measurements were compared with automated cuff measurements. Both the vasopressor use and nonvasopressor use groups showed a statistically significant difference between arterial and ClearSight measurements for systolic and diastolic pressures, but not for the MAP.
Conclusions: Measurements of MAP obtained by the ClearSight device were almost identical to those obtained by the intra-arterial catheter. Although there was a difference in systolic blood pressures between the two methods, in those patients receiving inotropic support, the difference was within the range of what is considered acceptable in validating blood pressure devices.