Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a preliminary report of a phase 1/2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 32702298
- PMCID: PMC7445431
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31604-4
Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a preliminary report of a phase 1/2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial
Erratum in
-
Department of Error.Lancet. 2020 Aug 15;396(10249):466. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31687-1. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 32798485 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Department of Error.Lancet. 2020 Dec 12;396(10266):1884. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32597-6. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 33308469 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: The pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) might be curtailed by vaccination. We assessed the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of a viral vectored coronavirus vaccine that expresses the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2.
Methods: We did a phase 1/2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial in five trial sites in the UK of a chimpanzee adenovirus-vectored vaccine (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein compared with a meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACWY) as control. Healthy adults aged 18-55 years with no history of laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection or of COVID-19-like symptoms were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 at a dose of 5 × 1010 viral particles or MenACWY as a single intramuscular injection. A protocol amendment in two of the five sites allowed prophylactic paracetamol to be administered before vaccination. Ten participants assigned to a non-randomised, unblinded ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 prime-boost group received a two-dose schedule, with the booster vaccine administered 28 days after the first dose. Humoral responses at baseline and following vaccination were assessed using a standardised total IgG ELISA against trimeric SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, a muliplexed immunoassay, three live SARS-CoV-2 neutralisation assays (a 50% plaque reduction neutralisation assay [PRNT50]; a microneutralisation assay [MNA50, MNA80, and MNA90]; and Marburg VN), and a pseudovirus neutralisation assay. Cellular responses were assessed using an ex-vivo interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay. The co-primary outcomes are to assess efficacy, as measured by cases of symptomatic virologically confirmed COVID-19, and safety, as measured by the occurrence of serious adverse events. Analyses were done by group allocation in participants who received the vaccine. Safety was assessed over 28 days after vaccination. Here, we report the preliminary findings on safety, reactogenicity, and cellular and humoral immune responses. The study is ongoing, and was registered at ISRCTN, 15281137, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04324606.
Findings: Between April 23 and May 21, 2020, 1077 participants were enrolled and assigned to receive either ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (n=543) or MenACWY (n=534), ten of whom were enrolled in the non-randomised ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 prime-boost group. Local and systemic reactions were more common in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group and many were reduced by use of prophylactic paracetamol, including pain, feeling feverish, chills, muscle ache, headache, and malaise (all p<0·05). There were no serious adverse events related to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. In the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group, spike-specific T-cell responses peaked on day 14 (median 856 spot-forming cells per million peripheral blood mononuclear cells, IQR 493-1802; n=43). Anti-spike IgG responses rose by day 28 (median 157 ELISA units [EU], 96-317; n=127), and were boosted following a second dose (639 EU, 360-792; n=10). Neutralising antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 were detected in 32 (91%) of 35 participants after a single dose when measured in MNA80 and in 35 (100%) participants when measured in PRNT50. After a booster dose, all participants had neutralising activity (nine of nine in MNA80 at day 42 and ten of ten in Marburg VN on day 56). Neutralising antibody responses correlated strongly with antibody levels measured by ELISA (R2=0·67 by Marburg VN; p<0·001).
Interpretation: ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 showed an acceptable safety profile, and homologous boosting increased antibody responses. These results, together with the induction of both humoral and cellular immune responses, support large-scale evaluation of this candidate vaccine in an ongoing phase 3 programme.
Funding: UK Research and Innovation, Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Thames Valley and South Midland's NIHR Clinical Research Network, and the German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner site Gießen-Marburg-Langen.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Two Middle East respiratory syndrome vaccines: first step for other coronavirus vaccines?Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;20(7):760-761. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30317-0. Epub 2020 Apr 21. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020. PMID: 32325036 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Encouraging results from phase 1/2 COVID-19 vaccine trials.Lancet. 2020 Aug 15;396(10249):448-449. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31611-1. Epub 2020 Jul 20. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 32702300 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine for SARS-CoV-2.Lancet. 2020 Nov 7;396(10261):1485-1486. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32271-6. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 33160563 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine for SARS-CoV-2.Lancet. 2020 Nov 7;396(10261):1486. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32270-4. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 33160564 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 - Authors' reply.Lancet. 2020 Nov 7;396(10261):1486-1487. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32267-4. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 33160565 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Safety and immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine administered in a prime-boost regimen in young and old adults (COV002): a single-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial.Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):1979-1993. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32466-1. Epub 2020 Nov 19. Lancet. 2021. PMID: 33220855 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in HIV infection: a single-arm substudy of a phase 2/3 clinical trial.Lancet HIV. 2021 Aug;8(8):e474-e485. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00103-X. Epub 2021 Jun 18. Lancet HIV. 2021. PMID: 34153264 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18 years or older: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.Lancet. 2020 Aug 15;396(10249):479-488. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31605-6. Epub 2020 Jul 20. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 32702299 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Prospect of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: Potential role in vaccine and therapeutic development.Virus Res. 2020 Oct 15;288:198141. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2020.198141. Epub 2020 Aug 23. Virus Res. 2020. PMID: 32846196 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Overview of the current promising approaches for the development of an effective severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine.Int Immunopharmacol. 2020 Nov;88:106928. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106928. Epub 2020 Aug 24. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020. PMID: 32862110 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Molecular and Biological Mechanisms Underlying Gender Differences in COVID-19 Severity and Mortality.Front Immunol. 2021 May 7;12:659339. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.659339. eCollection 2021. Front Immunol. 2021. PMID: 34025658 Free PMC article. Review.
-
SARS-CoV-2 Treatment Approaches: Numerous Options, No Certainty for a Versatile Virus.Front Pharmacol. 2020 Aug 26;11:1224. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01224. eCollection 2020. Front Pharmacol. 2020. PMID: 32982720 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Age- and sex-specific differences in immune responses to BNT162b2 COVID-19 and live-attenuated influenza vaccines in UK adolescents.Front Immunol. 2023 Oct 6;14:1248630. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1248630. eCollection 2023. Front Immunol. 2023. PMID: 37942333 Free PMC article.
-
SARS‑CoV-2 RBD219-N1C1: A yeast-expressed SARS-CoV-2 recombinant receptor-binding domain candidate vaccine stimulates virus neutralizing antibodies and T-cell immunity in mice.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Aug 3;17(8):2356-2366. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1901545. Epub 2021 Apr 13. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021. PMID: 33847226 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 vaccines - are we there yet?Aust Prescr. 2021 Feb;44(1):19-25. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2020.084. Epub 2020 Dec 17. Aust Prescr. 2021. PMID: 33664546 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- WHO . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2020. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) situation report—181.
-
- WHO Draft Landscape of COVID-19 candidate vaccines. July 14, 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/draft-landscape-of-covid-19-cand...
-
- Fidler S, Stöhr W, Pace M. Antiretroviral therapy alone versus antiretroviral therapy with a kick and kill approach, on measures of the HIV reservoir in participants with recent HIV infection (the RIVER trial): a phase 2, randomised trial. Lancet. 2020;395:888–898. - PubMed
-
- Hanke T. Aiming for protective T-cell responses: a focus on the first generation conserved-region HIVconsv vaccines in preventive and therapeutic clinical trials. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2019;18:1029–1041. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
