Attitudes and approaches to patient and public involvement across Europe: A systematic review
- PMID: 32705752
- DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13111
Attitudes and approaches to patient and public involvement across Europe: A systematic review
Abstract
The Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) is making great strides in promoting patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research across Europe, supporting patient organisations to be involved in the projects that it funds. Despite this, the literature around PPI in health services and research originating from European countries appears less than from the United Kingdom (UK), where PPI is well established. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to explore the attitudes and approaches to PPI across Europe. Eight scientific databases were systematically searched and data extracted. Data quality was assessed using a checklist based on the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public (GRIPP2) (Staniszewska et al., Research, Involvement and Engagement, 3, 13, 2017) and the critical appraisal guidelines developed by Wright et al. (Health Expectations, 13, 359, 2010). We included all studies reporting PPI activity in both public and private health services and research institutions in the World Health Organization European region, excluding the UK, published in the English language from 1996 to 2018. Forty studies in total were included in the analysis. The studies imply a growing interest and support for the idea of PPI in health services and, to a lesser extent, in health research. There seems to be a convergence of conceptualisations of PPI across Europe, with internationally significant areas of innovative work taking place in countries such as the Netherlands and the Scandinavian countries. However, the implementation of PPI is highly uneven, and PPI is not yet firmly embedded or adequately formalised in European healthcare systems and research, possibly due to a lack of infrastructure, guidance and support. In order to try to get a better understanding of what is happening on the ground, we are carrying out a survey with potential follow-up interviews as the next part of this research project. This work is currently on hold due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Keywords: Europe; approaches; attitudes; health research; health services; patient involvement; public involvement.
© 2020 The Authors. Health and Social Care in the Community published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447009
-
Reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research publications: using the GRIPP2 checklists with lay co-researchers.Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jul 22;7(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00295-w. Res Involv Engagem. 2021. PMID: 34294148 Free PMC article.
-
Patient and Public Involvement Within Orthopaedic Research: A Systematic Review.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jul 7;103(13):e51. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01573. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021. PMID: 34228669
-
Patient and public involvement in dementia research in the European Union: a scoping review.BMC Geriatr. 2019 Aug 14;19(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1217-9. BMC Geriatr. 2019. PMID: 31412788 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient and public involvement in Paediatric Intensive Care research: considerations, challenges and facilitating factors.Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Nov 7;2:32. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0046-7. eCollection 2016. Res Involv Engagem. 2016. PMID: 29507766 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Systematic Review: Patient and Public Involvement of Children and Young People in Mental Health Research.Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2024 Mar;27(1):257-274. doi: 10.1007/s10567-024-00470-x. Epub 2024 Feb 25. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2024. PMID: 38402358 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Public involvement in chronic respiratory diseases research: A qualitative study of patients', carers' and citizens' perspectives.Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13917. doi: 10.1111/hex.13917. Health Expect. 2024. PMID: 38375962 Free PMC article.
-
Involving parents of children treated for cancer in Sweden as public contributors to inform the design and conduct of an evaluation of internet-administered self-help for parents of children treated for cancer: a protocol.Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jan 2;10(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00532-4. Res Involv Engagem. 2024. PMID: 38167254 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Public and patient involvement in the development of an internet-based guide for persistent somatic symptoms (GUIDE.PSS): A qualitative study on the needs of those affected.Health Expect. 2023 Dec 7;27(1):e13931. doi: 10.1111/hex.13931. Online ahead of print. Health Expect. 2023. PMID: 38062910 Free PMC article.
-
The value of co-creating a clinical outcome assessment strategy for clinical trial research: process and lessons learnt.Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Oct 24;9(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00505-7. Res Involv Engagem. 2023. PMID: 37876009 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Abma, T. A., & Broerse, J. E. W. (2010). Patient participation as dialogue: Setting research agendas. Health Expectations, 13, 160-173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00549.x
-
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
-
- Brett, J., Staniszewska, S., Mockford, C., Herron-Marx, S., Hughes, J., Tysall, C., & Suleman, R. (2014). Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: A systematic review. Health Expectations, 17, 637-650. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x
-
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. (2009). Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.
-
- Coulter, A., & Collins, A. (2011). Making shared decision-making a reality: No decision without me. London: The Kings Fund [online].
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
