Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul 18;9(7):174.
doi: 10.3390/biology9070174.

Sperm Quality Assessment in Honey Bee Drones

Affiliations
Review

Sperm Quality Assessment in Honey Bee Drones

Jesús L Yániz et al. Biology (Basel). .

Abstract

The quality of honey bee drone semen is relevant in different contexts, ranging from colony productivity to pathology, toxicology and biodiversity preservation. Despite its importance, considerably less knowledge is available on this subject for the honey bee when compared to other domestic animal species. A proper assessment of sperm quality requires a multiple testing approach which discriminates between the different aspects of sperm integrity and functionality. Most studies on drone semen quality have only assessed a few parameters, such as sperm volume, sperm concentration and/or sperm plasma membrane integrity. Although more recent studies have focused on a broader variety of aspects of semen quality, some techniques currently used in vertebrates, such as computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) or multiparametric sperm quality testing, still remain to be developed in the honey bee. This may be attributed to the particular sperm morphology and physiology in this species, requiring the development of technologies specifically adapted to it. This article reviews the present knowledge of sperm quality in honey bee drones, highlighting its peculiarities and proposing future lines of research.

Keywords: Apis mellifera; male; reproduction; semen; sperm quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A combined phase-contrast and fluorescence (Hoechst) image of a honey bee spermatozoon showing the acrosome (a), nucleus (b) and flagellum (c). Scale-bar = 10 µm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Potts S.G., Biesmeijer J.C., Kremen C., Neumann P., Schweiger O., Kunin W.E. Global pollinator declines: Trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010;25:345–353. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Soroker V., Hetzroni A., Yakobson B., David D., David A., Voet H., Slabezki Y., Efrat H., Levski S., Kamer Y., et al. Evaluation of colony losses in Israel in relation to the incidence of pathogens and pests. Apidologie. 2011;42:192–199. doi: 10.1051/apido/2010047. - DOI
    1. Clermont A., Eickermann M., Kraus F., Georges C., Hoffmann L., Beyer M. A survey on some factors potentially affecting losses of managed honey bee colonies in Luxembourg over the winters 2010/2011 and 2011/2012. J. Apic. Res. 2014;53:43–56. doi: 10.3896/IBRA.1.53.1.04. - DOI
    1. Dainat B., Evans J.D., Chen Y.P., Gauthier L., Neumann P. Predictive markers of honey bee colony collapse. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e32151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032151. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pettis J.S., Rice N., Joselow K., van Engelsdorp D., Chaimanee V. Colony failure linked to low sperm viability in honey bee (Apis mellifera) queens and an exploration of potential causative factors. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0147220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147220. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources