Lessons Learnt (Clinical Outcomes and Cost Savings) from Virtual Stone Clinic and Their Application in the Era Post-COVID-19: Prospective Outcomes over a 6-Year Period from a University Teaching Hospital
- PMID: 32731751
- DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0708
Lessons Learnt (Clinical Outcomes and Cost Savings) from Virtual Stone Clinic and Their Application in the Era Post-COVID-19: Prospective Outcomes over a 6-Year Period from a University Teaching Hospital
Abstract
Introduction: We introduced a nurse-led telephone-based virtual stone clinic (VSC) follow-up for the surveillance of patients with asymptomatic renal calculi or those at a high risk of recurrent kidney stone disease (KSD). The aim of this study was to look at the outcomes of VSC and its role in the post-COVID era. Methods: Prospective outcomes audit was done for all patients referred to the VSC for a 6-year period (March 2014-April 2020). VSC is led by specialist stone nurses for on-going surveillance of KSD patients. Results: A total of 290 patients were seen (468 individual appointments; 1.6 ± 1.0 per patient), with a mean age of 57.0 ± 15.8 years (range: 17-92) and a men-women ratio of 3:2. The referral was for surveillance of asymptomatic small renal stones (230, 79.3%); history of recurrent stone disease (45, 15.5%); solitary kidneys (5, 1.7%); cystine stones; young age; and other conditions (10, 3.4%). The mean stone size was 5.0 ± 2.7 mm, followed up with kidney, ureter, and bladder radiograph (225, 77.6%) and ultrasound scan (USS) (65, 22.4%), for median duration of 12 months (range: 3-24 months). At the end, 132 patients (45.6%) remained in VSC, 106 (36.6%) were discharged, 47 (16.2%) returned to face-to-face clinic or treatment, and 5 (1.7%) had emergency admissions. Of 47 patients who returned, 23 (48.9%) developed new symptoms, 21 (44.6%) had stone growth, and 3 defaulted to face-to-face appointment. Thirty-five patients needed surgical intervention (URS-21, SWL-13, and PCNL-1) and 10 were managed conservatively. VSC reduced the cost per clinic appointment from £27.9 to £2 per patient (93% reduction), equating to a total saving of £12,006 for the study period. Conclusion: Nurse-led VSC not only provided a safe follow-up but also allowed to substantially reduce the cost of treatment by allowing patients to be either discharged or return to a face-to-face clinic or surgical intervention if needed. Post-COVID, this model using telemedicine will have a much wider uptake and further help to optimize health care resources.
Keywords: clinic; stone; telemedicine; telephone; virtual.
Similar articles
-
Ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation (URSL) for large (≥1 cm) paediatric stones: Outcomes from a university teaching hospital.J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Apr;13(2):202.e1-202.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Aug 24. J Pediatr Urol. 2017. PMID: 28336220
-
Endourologic Management (PCNL, URS, SWL) of Stones in Solitary Kidney: A Systematic Review from European Association of Urologists Young Academic Urologists and Uro-Technology Groups.J Endourol. 2020 Jan;34(1):7-17. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0455. Epub 2019 Sep 26. J Endourol. 2020. PMID: 31456421
-
Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study.J Endourol. 2017 May;31(5):510-516. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0825. Epub 2017 Mar 29. J Endourol. 2017. PMID: 28355100
-
Treatment selection for urolithiasis: percutaneous nephrolithomy, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, and active monitoring.World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1395-1399. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2030-8. Epub 2017 Mar 16. World J Urol. 2017. PMID: 28303335 Review.
-
Outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and laser fragmentation for treatment of large renal stones with and without the use of ureteral access sheaths: Results from a university hospital with a review of literature.Scand J Urol. 2016 Jun;50(3):216-9. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2015.1121407. Epub 2016 Jan 12. Scand J Urol. 2016. PMID: 27111193 Review.
Cited by
-
Can We Identify Patients in Danger of Delayed Treatment? Management of COVID-19 Pandemic Backlog in Urology Care in Poland.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 9;19(24):16547. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416547. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36554427 Free PMC article.
-
Telemedicine and Telehealth in Urology: Uptake, Impact and Barriers to Clinical Adoption.Front Surg. 2022 Jun 30;9:911206. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.911206. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 35846972 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Primary ureteroscopy versus emergency stenting and delayed ureteroscopy: Is there a winner?Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(3):451-452. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2021.Ed1. Epub 2021 Jun 2. Cent European J Urol. 2021. PMID: 34729236 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
