Objectives: Acute hemorrhage in the head and neck (AHNH) is life-threatening due to asphyxiation and hemorrhagic shock. When conservative measures fail, some patients benefit from endovascular therapy (EVT). While CTA is routinely used to localize bleeding and plan EVT in gastrointestinal hemorrhage, the diagnostic value of CTA in AHNH and role of CTA in treatment-planning are uncertain.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed neck CTAs from June 2015 to October 2018 indicated for AHNH. When performed, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) findings and EVT were documented. Extravasation or pseudoaneurysm on DSA was considered positive for bleed localization.
Results: Thirty CTA exams were performed for AHNH in 18 patients (mean age = 56.6, male% = 55.6%). Eleven out of 30 exams (36.7%) had immediate DSA follow-up within 24 h. Etiologies of hemorrhage included malignancy 11/18 (61.1%) and coagulopathy (4/18, 22.2%) among others. CTA reports identified definite or possible source of bleeding in 7/30 (23.3%) exams. Seven out of 7 (100%) patients with definite or possible source of bleeding on CTA underwent DSA and 4/23 (17.4%) patients underwent DSA despite negative CTA. With DSA as the gold standard, CTA had a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 100%.
Conclusions: CTA has high specificity and reasonable sensitivity for detecting arterial source of bleeding in patients presenting with AHNH. Patients with negative CTA may avoid catheter angiography in most cases; however, false-negative CTA should not preclude angiography in high-risk patients.
Keywords: Angiography, digital subtraction; Carotid artery, external; Computed tomography angiography; Epistaxis; Hemorrhage.