Characteristics and Outcomes of Contacts of COVID-19 Patients Monitored Using an Automated Symptom Monitoring Tool - Maine, May-June 2020
- PMID: 32759918
- PMCID: PMC7454893
- DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6931e2
Characteristics and Outcomes of Contacts of COVID-19 Patients Monitored Using an Automated Symptom Monitoring Tool - Maine, May-June 2020
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is spread from person to person (1-3). Quarantine of exposed persons (contacts) for 14 days following their exposure reduces transmission (4-7). Contact tracing provides an opportunity to identify contacts, inform them of quarantine recommendations, and monitor their symptoms to promptly identify secondary COVID-19 cases (7,8). On March 12, 2020, Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Maine CDC) identified the first case of COVID-19 in the state. Because of resource constraints, including staffing, Maine CDC could not consistently monitor contacts, and automated technological solutions for monitoring contacts were explored. On May 14, 2020, Maine CDC began enrolling contacts of patients with reported COVID-19 into Sara Alert (MITRE Corporation, 2020),* an automated, web-based, symptom monitoring tool. After initial communication with Maine CDC staff members, enrolled contacts automatically received daily symptom questionnaires via their choice of e-mailed weblink, text message, texted weblink, or telephone call until completion of their quarantine. Epidemiologic investigations were conducted for enrollees who reported symptoms or received a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result. During May 14-June 26, Maine CDC enrolled 1,622 contacts of 614 COVID-19 patients; 190 (11.7%) eventually developed COVID-19, highlighting the importance of identifying, quarantining, and monitoring contacts of COVID-19 patients to limit spread. In Maine, symptom monitoring was not feasible without the use of an automated symptom monitoring tool. Using a tool that permitted enrollees to specify a method of symptom monitoring was well received, because the majority of persons monitored (96.4%) agreed to report using this system.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Similar articles
-
Preventing and Mitigating SARS-CoV-2 Transmission - Four Overnight Camps, Maine, June-August 2020.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Sep 4;69(35):1216-1220. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6935e1. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020. PMID: 32881850 Free PMC article.
-
Containing COVID-19 Among 627,386 Persons in Contact With the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship Passengers Who Disembarked in Taiwan: Big Data Analytics.J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 5;22(5):e19540. doi: 10.2196/19540. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 32353827 Free PMC article.
-
SARS-CoV-2 Exposure and Infection Among Health Care Personnel - Minnesota, March 6-July 11, 2020.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Oct 30;69(43):1605-1610. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6943a5. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020. PMID: 33119557 Free PMC article.
-
A SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Illustrating the Challenges in Limiting the Spread of the Virus - Hopi Tribe, May-June 2020.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Nov 6;69(44):1654-1659. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6944a5. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020. PMID: 33151922 Free PMC article.
-
Science Brief: Options to Reduce Quarantine for Contacts of Persons with SARS-CoV-2 Infection Using Symptom Monitoring and Diagnostic Testing.2020 Dec 2. National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD), Division of Viral Diseases. CDC COVID-19 Science Briefs [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2020–2023. 2020 Dec 2. National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD), Division of Viral Diseases. CDC COVID-19 Science Briefs [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2020–2023. PMID: 34009768 Free Books & Documents. Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
The role of digital tools and emerging devices in COVID-19 contact tracing during the first 18 months of the pandemic: a systematic review.Eur J Public Health. 2024 Jul 1;34(Supplement_1):i11-i28. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae039. Eur J Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38946444 Free PMC article.
-
Short- and Long-Term Predicted and Witnessed Consequences of Digital Surveillance During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 May 24;10:e47154. doi: 10.2196/47154. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024. PMID: 38788212 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Testing for SARS-CoV-2: lessons learned and current use cases.Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024 Jun 13;37(2):e0007223. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00072-23. Epub 2024 Mar 15. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024. PMID: 38488364 Review.
-
Determinants of Dutch public health professionals' intention to use digital contact tracing support tools: A cross-sectional online questionnaire study.PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Feb 14;3(2):e0000425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000425. eCollection 2024 Feb. PLOS Digit Health. 2024. PMID: 38354119 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors of infection among close contacts of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jul 21;102(29):e34314. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034314. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023. PMID: 37478226 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kimball A, Hatfield KM, Arons M, et al.; Public Health – Seattle & King County; CDC COVID-19 Investigation Team. Asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in residents of a long-term care skilled nursing facility—King County, Washington, March 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69:377–81. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6913e1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous

