Rethinking Gain-of-Function Experiments in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic

mBio. 2020 Aug 7;11(4):e01868-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01868-20.

Abstract

Proponents of the use of gain-of-function (GOF) experiments with pathogens with pandemic potential (PPP) have argued that such experiments are necessary because they reveal important facets of pathogenesis and can be performed safely. Opponents of GOF experiments with PPP have argued that the risks outweigh the knowledge gained. The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates the vulnerability of human societies to a new PPP, while also validating some arguments of both camps, questioning others, and suggesting the need to rethink how we approach this class of experiments.

Keywords: biosafety; bioterrorism; policy.

Publication types

  • Editorial

MeSH terms

  • Betacoronavirus / genetics*
  • Biomedical Research / ethics
  • Biomedical Research / standards
  • Bioterrorism
  • COVID-19
  • Containment of Biohazards / ethics
  • Containment of Biohazards / standards
  • Coronavirus Infections / epidemiology
  • Coronavirus Infections / prevention & control
  • Coronavirus Infections / virology*
  • Gain of Function Mutation*
  • Humans
  • Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype / genetics
  • Influenza, Human / epidemiology
  • Influenza, Human / virology
  • Pandemics / prevention & control
  • Pneumonia, Viral / epidemiology
  • Pneumonia, Viral / prevention & control
  • Pneumonia, Viral / virology*
  • SARS-CoV-2