Added value of systematic biopsy in men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing biparametric MRI-targeted biopsy: multi-institutional external validation study
- PMID: 32778912
- PMCID: PMC8217016
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03393-8
Added value of systematic biopsy in men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing biparametric MRI-targeted biopsy: multi-institutional external validation study
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to develop and externally validate a nomogram based on MRI volumetric parameters and clinical information for deciding when SBx should be performed in addition to TBx in man with suspicious prostate MRI.
Materials and methods: Retrospective analyses of single (IMPROD, NCT01864135) and multi-institution (MULTI-IMPROD, NCT02241122) clinical trials. All men underwent a unique rapid biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (IMPROD bpMRI) consisting of T2-weighted imaging and three separate DWI acquisitions. Men with IMPROD bpMRI Likert scores of 3-5 were included. Logistic regression models were developed using IMPROD trial (n = 122) and validated using MULTI-IMPROD trial (n = 262) data. The model's performance was evaluated in the terms of PCa detection with Gleason Grade Group 1 (clinically insignificant prostate cancer, iPCa) and > 1 (clinically significant prostate cancer, csPCa). Net benefits and decision curve analyses (DCA) were compared. Combined biopsies were used for reference.
Results: The developed nomogram included age, PSA, prostate volume, MRI suspicion score (IMPROD bpMRI Likert or PIRADsv2.1 score), MRI-suspicion lesion volume percentage, and lesion location. All these variables were significant predictors of csPCa in SBx in multivariable analysis. In the validation cohort (n = 262) using different nomogram cutoffs, 19-43% of men would have avoided SBx while missing 1-4% of csPCa and avoiding detection of 9-20% of iPCa. Similar performance was found for nomograms using IMPROD bpMRI Likert score or v2.1.
Conclusions: The developed nomogram demonstrated potential to select men with a clinical suspicion of PCa who would benefit from performing SBx in addition to TBx. Public access to the nomogram is provided at: https://petiv.utu.fi/multiimprod/ .
Keywords: Biparametric MRI; MRI; PSA; Prostate cancer; Systematic biopsy; Targeted biopsy.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Qualitative and Quantitative Reporting of a Unique Biparametric MRI: Towards Biparametric MRI-Based Nomograms for Prediction of Prostate Biopsy Outcome in Men With a Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer (IMPROD and MULTI-IMPROD Trials).J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 May;51(5):1556-1567. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26975. Epub 2019 Nov 21. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020. PMID: 31750988
-
Negative Predictive Value of Biparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Significant Prostate Cancer: A Pooled Data Analysis Based on Clinical Data from Four Prospective, Registered Studies.Eur Urol Focus. 2021 May;7(3):522-531. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 May 14. Eur Urol Focus. 2021. PMID: 32418878
-
Validation of IMPROD biparametric MRI in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer: A prospective multi-institutional trial.PLoS Med. 2019 Jun 3;16(6):e1002813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002813. eCollection 2019 Jun. PLoS Med. 2019. PMID: 31158230 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.Dan Med J. 2017 Feb;64(2):B5327. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 28157066 Review.
-
Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):438-50. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.037. Epub 2014 Dec 3. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 25480312 Review.
Cited by
-
Which protocol for prostate biopsies in patients with a positive MRI? Interest of systematic biopsies by sectors.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023 Dec 19. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00770-3. Online ahead of print. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023. PMID: 38114598
-
Quantitative Evaluation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values, ISUP Grades and Prostate-Specific Antigen Density Values of Potentially Malignant PI-RADS Lesions.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 28;15(21):5183. doi: 10.3390/cancers15215183. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37958357 Free PMC article.
-
External Validation of the IMPROD-MRI Volumetric Model to Predict the Utility of Systematic Biopsies at the Time of Targeted Biopsy.J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 4;12(17):5748. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175748. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37685815 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting the Performance of Concurrent Systematic Random Biopsies during Image Fusion Targeted Sampling of Multi-Parametric MRI Detected Prostate Cancer. A Prospective Study (PRESET Study).Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 21;14(1):1. doi: 10.3390/cancers14010001. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 35008165 Free PMC article.
-
How to Improve TRUS-Guided Target Biopsy following Prostate MRI.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 11;13(22):5647. doi: 10.3390/cancers13225647. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34830798 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Perez IM, Jambor I, Kauko T, et al. Qualitative and quantitative reporting of a unique biparametric MRI: towards biparametric MRI-based nomograms for prediction of prostate biopsy outcome in men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (IMPROD and MULTI-IMPROD Trials) J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;51:1556–1567. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26975. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
