Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;26(6):3017-3036.
doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00256-8. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

Researchers' Perceptions of a Responsible Research Climate: A Multi Focus Group Study

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Researchers' Perceptions of a Responsible Research Climate: A Multi Focus Group Study

Tamarinde Haven et al. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Dec.
Free PMC article

Abstract

The research climate plays a key role in fostering integrity in research. However, little is known about what constitutes a responsible research climate. We investigated academic researchers' perceptions on this through focus group interviews. We recruited researchers from the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and the Amsterdam University Medical Center to participate in focus group discussions that consisted of researchers from similar academic ranks and disciplinary fields. We asked participants to reflect on the characteristics of a responsible research climate, the barriers they perceived and which interventions they thought fruitful to improve the research climate. Discussions were recorded and transcribed at verbatim. We used inductive content analysis to analyse the focus group transcripts. We conducted 12 focus groups with 61 researchers in total. We identified fair evaluation, openness, sufficient time, integrity, trust and freedom to be mentioned as important characteristics of a responsible research climate. Main perceived barriers were lack of support, unfair evaluation policies, normalization of overwork and insufficient supervision of early career researchers. Possible interventions suggested by the participants centered around improving support, discussing expectations and improving the quality of supervision. Some of the elements of a responsible research climate identified by participants are reflected in national and international codes of conduct, such as trust and openness. Although it may seem hard to change the research climate, we believe that the realisation that the research climate is suboptimal should provide the impetus for change informed by researchers' experiences and opinions.

Keywords: Research climate; Research integrity; Responsible conduct of research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson MS, Louis KS, Earle J. Disciplinary and departmental effects on observations of faculty and graduate student misconduct. The Journal of Higher Education. 1994;65(3):331. doi: 10.2307/2943971. - DOI
    1. Anderson MS, Ronning EA, De Vries R, Martinson BC. The perverse effects of competition on scientists’ work and relationships. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2007;13(4):437–461. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9042-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bird SJ. Mentors, advisors and supervisors: Their role in teaching responsible research conduct. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2001;7(4):455–468. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0002-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bouter LM. Commentary: Perverse incentives or rotten apples? Accountability in Research. 2015;22(3):148–161. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.950253. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyd L. Exploring the utility of workload models in academe: A pilot study. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2014;36(3):315–326. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2014.899050. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources