Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 12;15(8):e0236736.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236736. eCollection 2020.

A new trajectory approach for investigating the association between an environmental or occupational exposure over lifetime and the risk of chronic disease: Application to smoking, asbestos, and lung cancer

Affiliations

A new trajectory approach for investigating the association between an environmental or occupational exposure over lifetime and the risk of chronic disease: Application to smoking, asbestos, and lung cancer

Emilie Lévêque et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Quantifying the association between lifetime exposures and the risk of developing a chronic disease is a recurrent challenge in epidemiology. Individual exposure trajectories are often heterogeneous and studying their associations with the risk of disease is not straightforward. We propose to use a latent class mixed model (LCMM) to identify profiles (latent classes) of exposure trajectories and estimate their association with the risk of disease. The methodology is applied to study the association between lifetime trajectories of smoking or occupational exposure to asbestos and the risk of lung cancer in males of the ICARE population-based case-control study. Asbestos exposure was assessed using a job exposure matrix. The classes of exposure trajectories were identified using two separate LCMM for smoking and asbestos, and the association between the identified classes and the risk of lung cancer was estimated in a second stage using weighted logistic regression and all subjects. A total of 2026/2610 cases/controls had complete information on both smoking and asbestos exposure, including 1938/1837 cases/controls ever smokers, and 1417/1520 cases/controls ever exposed to asbestos. The LCMM identified four latent classes of smoking trajectories which had different risks of lung cancer, all much stronger than never smokers. The most frequent class had moderate constant intensity over lifetime while the three others had either long-term, distant or recent high intensity. The latter had the strongest risk of lung cancer. We identified five classes of asbestos exposure trajectories which all had higher risk of lung cancer compared to men never occupationally exposed to asbestos, whatever the dose and the timing of exposure. The proposed approach opens new perspectives for the analyses of dose-time-response relationships between protracted exposures and the risk of developing a chronic disease, by providing a complete picture of exposure history in terms of intensity, duration, and timing of exposure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Selection of subjects for the statistical analysis, ICARE case-control study, 2001–2007, France.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Lifetime trajectories of smoking intensities, ICARE case-control study, 2001–2007, France.
The left panel shows the estimated mean trajectory of smoking intensity in the four latent classes. The right panel shows for each class, 20 randomly selected observed individual trajectories of subjects who had a high probability (close to 1) to belong to the class, with the bold line representing the estimated mean trajectory in the Class, with its 95% CI. The representation of each estimated mean trajectory is truncated at the 95th percentile of the distribution of observed exposure times in subjects a posteriori classified in the class.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Lifetime trajectories of intensities of occupational exposure to asbestos, ICARE case-control study, 2001–2007, France.
The left panel shows the estimated mean trajectory of asbestos intensity in the class of low cumulative exposure to asbestos (Class 5 including all subjects with a CIE lower than 0.26 f/mL-years) and in the four latent classes identified with the LCMM on the remaining subjects ever exposed to asbestos (Classes 1 to 4). The right panel shows for each class, 20 randomly selected observed individual trajectories of subjects who had a high probability (close to 1) to belong to the class, with the bold line representing the estimated mean trajectory in the Class, with its 95% CI. The representation of each estimated mean trajectory is truncated at the 95th percentile of the distribution of observed exposure times in subjects a posteriori classified in the class.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thomas D. Statistical Methods in Environmental Epidemiology Oxford; 2009.
    1. Vacek PM. Assessing the effect of intensity when exposure varies over time. Statistics in medicine. 1997;16(5):505–13. - PubMed
    1. Richardson DB. Latency models for analyses of protracted exposures. Epidemiology. 2009;20(3):395–9. 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318194646d - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vermeulen R, Chadeau-Hyam M. Dynamic aspects of exposure history-do they matter? Epidemiology. 2012;23(6):900–1. 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31826cc1cb - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lévêque E, Lacourt A, Luce D, Sylvestre M-P, Guénel P, Stücker I, et al. Time-dependent effect of intensity of smoking and of occupational exposure to asbestos on the risk of lung cancer: results from the ICARE case–control study. Occup Environ Med 2018;75(8):586 10.1136/oemed-2017-104953 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

The results reported herein correspond to specific aims of source of support [2013/1/177] to investigator KL from The French National Research Program for Environmental and Occupational Health of Anses with support of the Cancer TMOI of the French National Alliance for Life and Health Sciences (AVIESAN). EL was supported by a doctoral award from the French national institute of cancer (INCa). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.