Sex-based differences in mitral valve Re-operation after mitral valve repair: Truth or myth?

Am J Surg. 2020 Nov;220(5):1344-1350. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.06.069. Epub 2020 Jul 7.

Abstract

Background: Outcomes after mitral valve (MV) repair are known to be worse in women. Less is known about sex-based differences in MV repair durability.

Methods: All adult patients undergoing MV repair from 2002 to 2016 were reviewed. Of 2463 cases, 947 (39%) were women. Re-operation risk was defined as any intervention for repair failure or MV disease progression. Median follow-up was 8.2 years.

Results: Women were older with higher STS-risk scores and were more likely to have rheumatic disease (RHD). Operative mortality was clinically higher in women (2.7% vs 1.7%; P = 0.09). Although women had significantly higher 10-year re-operation risk (7% vs 4%), adjusted longitudinal analysis showed that this was associated with RHD in women (HR 4.04; P = 0.001). Female sex alone was not a significant predictor (P = 0.21).

Conclusions: Re-operation following MV repair was infrequent. Women had increased re-operation risk that was largely attributable to their worse preoperative profiles rather than female sex alone.

Keywords: Gender differences; Mitral valve repair; Mitral valve surgery; Re-operation.

Publication types

  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / mortality
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Mitral Valve / surgery*
  • Reoperation / statistics & numerical data*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Sex Factors
  • Young Adult