Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 13;9(8):72.
doi: 10.1038/s41389-020-00257-z.

Targeting PD-L1 in non-small cell lung cancer using CAR T cells

Affiliations

Targeting PD-L1 in non-small cell lung cancer using CAR T cells

Ming Liu et al. Oncogenesis. .

Abstract

Antibodies against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) have dramatically changed the landscape of therapies for non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC); however, the majority of patients do not respond to these agents. In addition, hyperprogressive disease (HPD) develops in a larger portion of NSCLC patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors than in patients treated with standard chemotherapy. The use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells has been successful to treat blood cancers but not for solid tumors like NSCLC. In this work, we constructed CAR T cells that target PD-L1 and evaluated their efficacy in NSCLC with either high or low PD-L1 expression. PD-L1-CAR T cells exhibited antigen-specific activation, cytokine production, and cytotoxic activity against PD-L1high NSCLC cells and xenograft tumors. Furthermore, the addition of a subtherapeutic dose of local radiotherapy improved the efficacy of PD-L1-CAR T cells against PD-L1low NSCLC cells and tumors. Our findings indicate that PD-L1-CAR T cells represent a novel therapeutic strategy for patients with PD-L1-positive NSCLC, particularly for those who are susceptible to HPD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Characteristics of PD-L1-CAR T cells.
a Schematic diagram of PD-L1-CAR and CD19-CAR constructs. scFv for PD-L1 is derived from atezolizumab (Roche). b Surface expression of PD-L1-CAR on transduced T cells as measured by flow cytometry using Biotin-Protein L and APC-streptavidin on day 5 post transduction. c Viability of PD-L1-CAR T cells on day 7 and 14 post-transduction. d Expansion of PD-L1-CAR and CD19-CAR T cells in vitro for 14 days. e Percentage of CAR T cells that were positive for CD3, CD4, CD8, PD-1, PD-L1, and TIM3 on day 7 and 14. f Percentage of CAR T cells that were positive for memory cell markers on day 7 and 14. Data represented technical triplicates using T cells from one donor and were displayed as mean ± SEM. *p ≤ 0.05, ns not significant.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. PD-L1-CAR T cells kill NSCLC cells in a PD-L1-dependent manner.
a Flow cytometry histogram of the surface antigen expression of PD-L1 in human NSCLC cell lines and BEAS-2B. b Cytotoxic activity of PD-L1-CAR T cells after 4 and 20 h of co-culture with human NSCLC cell lines and BEAS-2B. PD-L1-CAR T cells and CD19-CAR T cells were used as effector cells at various ratios of effector (E): target (T). c Secretion of cytokines analyzed by ELISA in supernatants obtained after a 20-h co-culture of effector and target cells at a 2:1 E:T ratio. Data represented technical triplicates using T cells from one donor and were shown as mean ± SEM. ****p ≤ 0.0001.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. PD-L1-CAR T cells inhibit the growth of human PD-L1high NSCLC in a xenograft model.
a Experimental design of the tumor xenograft model infused with PD-L1-CAR or CD19-CAR T cells. b.NSG mice were inoculated with 1.0 × 106 H1975-Fluc cells and infused intravenously with 5 × 106 PD-L1-CAR T cells or CD19-CAR T cells twice on day 7 and 0 (n = 5 mice per group). Bioluminescence imaging was used to assess tumor growth on day 7, 14, and 28 post tumor cell inoculation. c Bioluminescence kinetics of H1975-Fluc (n = 5 mice per group). d The percentage of PD-L1-positive cells within tumors. All cells were extracted from tumors of each treatment group on day 28 after inoculation and the expression of PD-L1 was evaluated by flow cytometry. e Representative IHC images of CD19-CAR or PD-L1-CAR T cell-treated NSCLC tumors for PD-L1 and Ki67. Scale bars, 100 µm. f Hematoxylin and eosin staining of tumors or organs on day 28. Scale bars, 200 µm. ****p ≤ 0.0001.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Persistence of PD-L1-CAR T cells in mice.
a Experimental design of HCC827-Fluc tumors with PD-L1-CAR T-cell therapy and re-challenge. b Serial bioluminescence imaging of tumor progression and regression. c, d Bioluminescence kinetics of HCC827-Fluc tumors (n = 5 mice per group). For the CD19-CAR T cell control group, a separated cohort of NSG mice was challenged with HCC-827-Fluc cells at day 70.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Enhanced tumor PD-L1 expression after irradiation treatment.
a Signal intensities of PD-L1 expression in cell lines treated with 5 Gy radiation as analyzed by flow cytometry. b Percentage of PD-L1-positive cells and cell viability in A549 cells treated with different doses of radiation for 24 or 48 h. c The effect of radiation treatment on anti-tumor efficacy of PD-L1-CAR T cells at different effector (E): target (T) ratios. Data represented technical triplicates using T cells from one donor and were shown as mean ± SEM. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ****p ≤ 0.0001, ns not significant.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Synergistic efficacy of irradiation and PD-L1-CAR T-cell therapy in a PD-L1 low NSCLC xenograft model.
a Experimental design of tumor cell xenograft model treated with CAR T cells and/or irradiation. b Serial bioluminescence imaging of tumor progression and regression in each group (n = 3 mice per group). c Bioluminescence kinetics of A549-Fluc (n = 3 mice per group) in each treatment group. d Representative IHC of PD-L1 in irradiation-treated NSCLC tumors. Scale bars, 100 µm. e Representative images of CD3 IHC in PD-L1-CAR T cell-treated and irradiation-treated NSCLC tumors. Scale bars, 100 µm. f Hematoxylin and eosin staining of tumors. Scale bars, 50 µm. *p ≤ 0.05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray, F. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer J. Clin. 10.3322/caac.21492 (2018). - PubMed
    1. Boloker G, Wang C, Zhang J. Updated statistics of lung and bronchus cancer in United States (2018) J. Thorac. Dis. 2018;10:1158–1161. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.15. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tamura T, et al. Specific organ metastases and survival in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2015;3:217–221. doi: 10.3892/mco.2014.410. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lanuti M, et al. Observations in lung cancer over multiple decades: an analysis of outcomes and cost at a single high-volume institution. Eur. J. Cardio Thorac. Surg. 2014;46:254–261. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt611. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bui, K. T., Cooper, W. A., Kao, S. & Boyer, M. Targeted molecular treatments in non-small cell lung cancer: a clinical guide for oncologists. J. Clin. Med.10.3390/jcm7080192 (2018). - PMC - PubMed