Diagnostic Accuracy of Symptoms, Physical Signs, and Laboratory Tests for Giant Cell Arteritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- PMID: 32804186
- PMCID: PMC7432275
- DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3050
Diagnostic Accuracy of Symptoms, Physical Signs, and Laboratory Tests for Giant Cell Arteritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
Importance: Current clinical guidelines recommend selecting diagnostic tests for giant cell arteritis (GCA) based on pretest probability that the disease is present, but how pretest probability should be estimated remains unclear.
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms, physical signs, and laboratory tests for suspected GCA.
Data sources: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from November 1940 through April 5, 2020.
Study selection: Trials and observational studies describing patients with suspected GCA, using an appropriate reference standard for GCA (temporal artery biopsy, imaging test, or clinical diagnosis), and with available data for at least 1 symptom, physical sign, or laboratory test.
Data extraction and synthesis: Screening, full text review, quality assessment, and data extraction by 2 investigators. Diagnostic test meta-analysis used a bivariate model.
Main outcome(s) and measures: Diagnostic accuracy parameters, including positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs).
Results: In 68 unique studies (14 037 unique patients with suspected GCA; of 7798 patients with sex reported, 5193 were women [66.6%]), findings associated with a diagnosis of GCA included limb claudication (positive LR, 6.01; 95% CI, 1.38-26.16), jaw claudication (positive LR, 4.90; 95% CI, 3.74-6.41), temporal artery thickening (positive LR, 4.70; 95% CI, 2.65-8.33), temporal artery loss of pulse (positive LR, 3.25; 95% CI, 2.49-4.23), platelet count of greater than 400 × 103/μL (positive LR, 3.75; 95% CI, 2.12-6.64), temporal tenderness (positive LR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.14-8.65), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate greater than 100 mm/h (positive LR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.43-6.78). Findings that were associated with absence of GCA included the absence of erythrocyte sedimentation rate of greater than 40 mm/h (negative LR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.08-0.44), absence of C-reactive protein level of 2.5 mg/dL or more (negative LR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.25-0.59), and absence of age over 70 years (negative LR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.27-0.86).
Conclusions and relevance: This study identifies the clinical and laboratory features that are most informative for a diagnosis of GCA, although no single feature was strong enough to confirm or refute the diagnosis if taken alone. Combinations of these symptoms might help direct further investigation, such as vascular imaging, temporal artery biopsy, or seeking evaluation for alternative diagnoses.
Conflict of interest statement
Comment in
-
Clinical Diagnosis-Is There Any Other Type?JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Oct 1;180(10):1304-1305. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3048. JAMA Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 32804219 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic performance of temporal artery ultrasound for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.Autoimmun Rev. 2019 Jan;18(1):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Nov 5. Autoimmun Rev. 2019. PMID: 30408588
-
Halo sign on temporal artery ultrasound versus temporal artery biopsy for giant cell arteritis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 7;2(2):CD013199. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013199.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38323659
-
Giant cell arteritis restricted to the limb arteries: An overlooked clinical entity.Autoimmun Rev. 2015 Apr;14(4):352-7. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2014.12.005. Epub 2014 Dec 17. Autoimmun Rev. 2015. PMID: 25528219 Review.
-
Temporal Artery Biopsy in the Workup of Giant Cell Arteritis: Diagnostic Considerations in a Veterans Administration Cohort.J Neuroophthalmol. 2020 Dec;40(4):450-456. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000001040. J Neuroophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 32868573
-
Does this patient have temporal arteritis?JAMA. 2002 Jan 2;287(1):92-101. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.1.92. JAMA. 2002. PMID: 11754714 Review.
Cited by
-
A Rare Case of Extracranial Giant Cell Arteritis in a Patient With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Cureus. 2024 Oct 16;16(10):e71634. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71634. eCollection 2024 Oct. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39553085 Free PMC article.
-
[Inflammatory causes of stroke-Diagnostics and treatment].Nervenarzt. 2024 Oct;95(10):909-919. doi: 10.1007/s00115-024-01711-8. Epub 2024 Jul 30. Nervenarzt. 2024. PMID: 39080056 Free PMC article. German.
-
Updates in the Management of Giant Cell Arteritis.Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2024 Aug;24(8):285-291. doi: 10.1007/s11910-024-01348-9. Epub 2024 Jun 24. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38913278 Review.
-
The spectrum of giant cell arteritis through a rheumatology lens.Eye (Lond). 2024 Aug;38(12):2437-2447. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03153-7. Epub 2024 Jun 19. Eye (Lond). 2024. PMID: 38898105 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Multimodality imaging to assess diagnosis and evaluate complications of large vesselarteritis.J Nucl Cardiol. 2024 Jul;37:101864. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2024.101864. Epub 2024 Apr 24. J Nucl Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 38663459 Review.
References
-
- Diamantopoulos AP, Haugeberg G, Lindland A, Myklebust G. The fast-track ultrasound clinic for early diagnosis of giant cell arteritis significantly reduces permanent visual impairment: towards a more effective strategy to improve clinical outcome in giant cell arteritis? Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016;55(1):66-70. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kev289 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
