Exemplary Practices in Cardiovascular Care: Results on Clinical Quality Measures from the EvidenceNOW Southwest Cooperative
- PMID: 32808208
- PMCID: PMC7661662
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06094-5
Exemplary Practices in Cardiovascular Care: Results on Clinical Quality Measures from the EvidenceNOW Southwest Cooperative
Abstract
Background: Identifying characteristics of primary care practices that perform well on cardiovascular clinical quality measures (CQMs) may point to important practice improvement strategies.
Objective: To identify practice characteristics associated with high performance on four cardiovascular disease CQMs.
Design: Longitudinal cohort study among 211 primary care practices in Colorado and New Mexico. Quarterly CQM reports were obtained from 178 (84.4%) practices. There was 100% response rate for baseline practice characteristics and implementation tracking surveys. Follow-up implementation tracking surveys were completed for 80.6% of practices.
Participants: Adult patients, staff, and clinicians in family medicine, general internal medicine, and mixed-specialty practices.
Intervention: Practices received 9 months of practice facilitation and health information technology support, plus biannual collaborative learning sessions.
Main measures: This study identified practice characteristics associated with overall highest performance using area under the curve (AUC) analysis on aspirin therapy, blood pressure management, and smoking cessation CQMs.
Results: Among 178 practices, 39 were exemplars. Exemplars were more likely to be a Federally Qualified Health Center (69.2% vs 35.3%, p = 0.0006), have an underserved designation (69.2% vs 45.3%, p = 0.0083), and have higher percentage of patients with Medicaid (p < 0.0001). Exemplars reported greater use of cardiovascular disease registries (61.5% vs 29.5%,), standing orders (38.5 vs 22.3%) or electronic health record prompts (84.6% vs 49.6%) (all p < 0.05), were more likely to have medical home recognition (74.4% vs 43.2%, p = 0.0006), and reported greater implementation of building blocks of high-performing primary care: regular quality improvement team meetings (3.0 vs 2.2), patient experience survey (3.1 vs 2.2), and resources for patients to manage their health (3.0 vs 2.3). High improvers (n = 45) showed greater improvement implementing team-based care (32.8 vs 11.7, p = 0.0004) and population management (37.4 vs 20.5, p = 0.0057).
Conclusions: Multiple strategies-registries, prompts and protocols, patient self-management support, and patient-team partnership activities-were associated with delivering high-quality cardiovascular care over time, measured by CQMs.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02515578.
Keywords: cardiovascular disease; practice facilitation; primary healthcare; quality improvement; quality indicators.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Primary Care Practices' Implementation of Patient-Team Partnership: Findings from EvidenceNOW Southwest.J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Jul-Aug;32(4):490-504. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180361. J Am Board Fam Med. 2019. PMID: 31300569
-
Primary Care Practices' Ability to Report Electronic Clinical Quality Measures in the EvidenceNOW Southwest Initiative to Improve Heart Health.JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198569. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8569. JAMA Netw Open. 2019. PMID: 31390033 Free PMC article.
-
Practice Transformation Support and Patient Engagement to Improve Cardiovascular Care: From EvidenceNOW Southwest (ENSW).J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Sep-Oct;33(5):675-686. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.05.190395. J Am Board Fam Med. 2020. PMID: 32989062 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Learning from primary care meaningful use exemplars.J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 May-Jun;28(3):360-70. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.03.140219. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015. PMID: 25957369
-
Developing and evaluating packages to support implementation of quality indicators in general practice: the ASPIRE research programme, including two cluster RCTs.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2020 Mar. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2020 Mar. PMID: 32250581 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Association of Clinician Practice Ownership With Ability of Primary Care Practices to Improve Quality Without Increasing Burnout.JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Mar 3;4(3):e230299. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0299. JAMA Health Forum. 2023. PMID: 37000432 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34523117 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Quality Payment Program. https://qpp.cms.gov. Published 2019. Accessed 08/28/2019.
-
- National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). NCQA Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Standards and Guidelines. 2017 Edition, Version 2 (Effective September 30, 2017) ed. Washington, DC: National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA); 2017.
-
- Health Resources and Services Administration. Uniform Data System: Reporting Tables for the 2019 Health Center Data. In: Bureau of Primary Health Care, ed: Health Resources and Services Administration; 2019.
-
- Litvin CB, Ornstein SM, Wessell AM, Nemeth LS. “Meaningful” clinical quality measures for primary care physicians. Am J Manag Care. 2015;21(10):e583–590. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
