Indications for Computed Tomography in Older Adult Patients With Minor Head Injury in the Emergency Department
- PMID: 32815620
- DOI: 10.1111/acem.14113
Indications for Computed Tomography in Older Adult Patients With Minor Head Injury in the Emergency Department
Abstract
Older age is a risk factor for intracranial injury after head trauma, and computed tomography (CT) is generally recommended. We aimed to develop a clinical prediction rule for risk stratification to avoid CT head imaging in older adult patients with minor head injury, named Computed Tomography of the Head for the patients at Advanced age (CTHEAD). This was a single-center observational study in Japan that used retrospective chart review data to service a prediction rule that was prospectively validated. Patients aged ≥ 65 years who presented to our emergency department with a chief complaint of head trauma and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of ≥13 were eligible. Patients were excluded if they had GCS score < 13, anticoagulant therapy, focal neurologic symptoms, posttraumatic seizures, penetrating injury, evident depressed fracture, unknown mechanism, or CT not undertaken. The primary outcome was acute traumatic lesion on head CT. We screened 1,494 patients; 538 were included in the derivation cohort, and 580, in the validation cohort. Multivariable analysis of the derivation group found that high-risk mechanisms of injury, vomiting, witnessed loss of consciousness, and anterograde amnesia were significantly associated with traumatic head findings on CT. A clinical prediction rule was developed from these four risk factors. The negative predictive value (NPV) of the absence of the four components was 95.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 92.9% to 96.7%), and the positive predictive value (PPV) of one or more risk factors was 20.6% (95% CI = 17.3% to 24.4%). The rule was validated prospectively with an NPV of zero risk factors of 94.5% (95% CI = 92.4% to 96.1%) and a PPV of one or more risk factors of 15.9% (95% CI = 13.0% to 19.3%). Fifty-three (9.1%) patients in the validation cohort experienced the primary outcome. The results suggest that older adult patients with minor head injury may forgo head CT if they do not have high-risk mechanisms of injury, vomiting, witnessed loss of consciousness, or anterograde amnesia. External validation of this rule is needed.
© 2020 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
Similar articles
-
Performance of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for predicting any traumatic intracranial injury on computed tomography in a United States Level I trauma center.Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;19(1):2-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01247.x. Acad Emerg Med. 2012. PMID: 22251188 Free PMC article.
-
External validation of computed tomography decision rules for minor head injury: prospective, multicentre cohort study in the Netherlands.BMJ. 2018 Aug 24;362:k3527. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3527. BMJ. 2018. PMID: 30143521 Free PMC article.
-
Will Neuroimaging Reveal a Severe Intracranial Injury in This Adult With Minor Head Trauma?: The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review.JAMA. 2015 Dec 22-29;314(24):2672-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.16316. JAMA. 2015. PMID: 26717031 Review.
-
PECARN prediction rules for CT imaging of children presenting to the emergency department with blunt abdominal or minor head trauma: a multicentre prospective validation study.Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2024 May;8(5):339-347. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00029-4. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2024. PMID: 38609287
-
Relevance of emergency head CT scan for fall in the elderly person.J Neuroradiol. 2020 Feb;47(1):54-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Apr 2. J Neuroradiol. 2020. PMID: 30951766 Review.
Cited by
-
Head injury in older adults presenting to the ambulance service: who do we convey to the emergency department, and what clinical variables are associated with an intracranial bleed? A retrospective case-control study.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 31;31(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01138-1. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023. PMID: 37908011 Free PMC article.
-
Revisiting Choosing Wisely recommendation #1: "Don't order CT head scan in adults and children who have suffered minor head injuries (unless positive for a validated clinical decision rule)".CJEM. 2023 Jun;25(6):458-461. doi: 10.1007/s43678-023-00515-0. Epub 2023 May 30. CJEM. 2023. PMID: 37253996 No abstract available.
-
Management of older adults after mild head trauma in an oral and maxillofacial surgery clinic.Eur Geriatr Med. 2023 Jun;14(3):603-613. doi: 10.1007/s41999-023-00781-2. Epub 2023 Apr 19. Eur Geriatr Med. 2023. PMID: 37074561
References
-
- Haydel MJ, Preston CA, Mills TJ, Luber S, Blaudeau E, DeBlieux PM. Indications for computed tomography in patients. N Engl J Med 2000;343:100-5.
-
- Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen K, et al. The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet 2001;357:1391-6.
-
- Mower WR, Hoffman JR, Herbert M, Wolfson AB, Pollack CV, Zucker MI. Developing a decision instrument to guide computed tomographic imaging of blunt head injury patients. J Trauma 2005;59:954-9.
-
- Jagoda AS, Bazarian JJ, Bruns JJ, et al. Clinical policy: neuroimaging and decisionmaking in adult mild traumatic brain injury in the acute setting. Ann Emerg Med 2008;52:714-48.
-
- Ro YS, Do SS, Holmes JF, et al. Comparison of clinical performance of cranial computed tomography rules in patients with minor head injury: a multicenter prospective study. Acad Emerg Med 2011;18:597-604.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
